July 30, 2002
I'll be doing all my work in Linux, so as for right now, its going to be command line all the way. If I find a nice graphical CVS proggy for linux I will be sure to let the group know. Thanks for letting me know about these other programs though.

-Jon


July 31, 2002
"Jonathan Andrew" <jon@ece.arizona.edu> wrote in message news:3D46EC31.CAE65C6E@ece.arizona.edu...
>
> I'll be doing all my work in Linux, so as for right now, its going to be command line all the way. If I find a nice graphical CVS proggy for linux I will be sure to let the group know. Thanks for letting me know about these other programs though.
>
Actually, using cvs from the commandline is much more comfortable than from a GUI. Even newbies (including me) use the GUI only to learn the actual underlying CVS commands and then manually run it on the commandline.

-Krish


July 31, 2002
"V. Krishnakumar" <lvimala@eth.net> wrote in message news:ai8if7$nor$1@digitaldaemon.com...

> Actually, using cvs from the commandline is much more comfortable than
from
> a GUI. Even newbies (including me) use the GUI only to learn the actual underlying CVS commands and then manually run it on the commandline.

   Ahem...

<OT:rant>
   For more complex stuff like branching, you'd use command line, yes. But
for your standard checkouts, diffs, updates, adds and commits, I'd seriously
beg to differ. I'd never, ever use command line unless there was no other
option.
</OT:rant>

Salutaciones,
                         JCAB



1 2
Next ›   Last »