Roberto Mariottini wrote:
> 
> In article <bo39ao$m2h$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Matthew Wilson says...
> >
> >Well, firstly, my post was a long time ago. Several weeks at least
> >
> >Second, implicit conversions to/from numeric and non-numeric types is a flaw, just as much as switch, etc. Just because a majority of people think that ease of coding is more important than correctness and maintainability, does not mean the issue is moot, merely boring and unpopular.
> 
> I agree. Completely.
> Can we add a page on the D Wiki for the "boolean != bit" party?

Here it is:
   http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BooleanNotEquBit

> This issue comes
> back every one-two months, and always the same things are said about it. A big
> summary of "bool != bit" advantages can be set up, so that the misbeliving can
> be redirected there for more information.

-- 
Helmut Leitner    leitner@hls.via.at
Graz, Austria   www.hls-software.com

"Helmut Leitner" <leitner@hls.via.at> wrote in message news:3FA77603.6E09CC95@hls.via.at...

> > Can we add a page on the D Wiki for the "boolean != bit" party?
>
> Here it is:
>    http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BooleanNotEquBit



Cool!

I put some stupid preliminary stuff there, please delete! ;)

[This Wikiing is real fun indeed.. I've done that now for the first time. Hope the server survived my 20-something consecutive updates... ;)]

Cheers,
Sz.

Luna Kid wrote:
> > > Can we add a page on the D Wiki for the "boolean != bit" party?
> >
> > Here it is:
> >    http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BooleanNotEquBit
> 
> Cool!
> 
> I put some stupid preliminary stuff there, please delete! ;)
> 
> [This Wikiing is real fun indeed.. I've done that now for the first time. Hope the server survived my 20-something consecutive updates... ;)]

Now I know why my server was green in the face and wouldn't speak to me that morning... :-)

-- 
Helmut Leitner    leitner@hls.via.at
Graz, Austria   www.hls-software.com