June 20, 2004
Helmut Leitner wrote:

> If contributors prefer, we can care for a special domain for this wiki.

Don't think there is a need for that. prowiki.org is so neutral that there shouldn't be any confusion.
June 21, 2004

Norbert Nemec wrote:
> 
> Helmut Leitner wrote:
> >> Sorry, but choosing appropriate terms is everything but nitpick! "Roadmap" is strongly misleading in the two places where it is used. People reading it will expect something about the future plans for D. For example:
> >
> > I agree, I chose the name. It's my fault.
> >
> > The preferred ways are:
> >   (1) change the name yourself (it's a wiki after all)
> >   (2) post your comments to the wiki (so that the wikizens there will
> >   know)
> 
> I'm not very comfortable with writing to the wiki yet. Especially, I don't think it is a good idea to choose editing the title of some major page as my first action as a newcomer... :-)

If the change makes perfect sense, you don't need to worry.

On the other hand, it would be perfect wiki behaviour, to
  - create your homepage
  - suggest the change or other improvements
      - at the page in question or
      - at the MessageBoard

> > No, with a few exceptions, they exist in a flat space.
> > Hierarchies are hard to maintain in a multiple point of view system.
> > We use folders and roadmaps (the real ones) to create order in wikis.
> 
> Guess it will take me some time to adjust to that philosophy. I've just a little experience with two other WIKI systems and each one seems to have a philosophy on its own.

Which wikis?

> But then - this one seems simple enough to learn quickly.

I hope so. We always listen to feedback and try to improve the system.

-- 
Helmut Leitner    leitner@hls.via.at
Graz, Austria   www.hls-software.com
1 2
Next ›   Last »