Would be great if you did!

Andrei

P.S. Please use phobos at puremagic.com instead of phobos at erdani.com. If you haven't subscribed already, you missed out! Subscribe at http://lists.puremagic.com/

David Simcha wrote:
> Now that __ctfe has officially been folded into the compiler, is anyone else already planning on making most of std.math CTFE-compatible?  If not, I'll probably start working on this.  Also, as far as the design, I think there should probably be a separate etc.ctfemath module under the hood (though not exposed to the user).  std.math would import this module and do something like:
> 
> real someFun(real num) {
>     if(__ctfe) {
>         return etc.ctfemath.someFun(num);
>    }
> 
>     // RTFE implementation.
> }
> 
> This would make things a lot easier to test, etc.