dmd 2.065 beta 1

[dmd-beta] dmd 2.065 beta 1

Jan 18, 2014

Andrew Edwards

Jan 20, 2014

Jan 20, 2014

Jan 20, 2014

Jan 20, 2014

Jan 21, 2014

Jan 20, 2014

Jan 20, 2014

Jan 20, 2014

http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.beta.1.zip Current list of regressions: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

On Jan 18, 2014, at 09:28 PM, Andrew Edwards <edwards.ac@gmail.com> wrote: > http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.beta.1.zip Is there a chance we can get an archive that is compilable with Zip 2.0/20? This is the maximum version that both std.zip and the zip module in Tango can handle. The ones created by Walter have been compatible. -- /Jacob Carlborg

Jacob Carlborg <doob@me.com> schrieb: >Is there a chance we can get an archive that is compilable with Zip 2.0/20? This is the maximum version that both std.zip and the zip module in Tango can handle. The ones created by Walter have been compatible. > I think Andrew had to manually add the windows files due to https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/installer/pull/41. This maybe the reason why the zip version is newer, what's the number? _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

On Jan 20, 2014, at 10:32 AM, Martin Nowak <code@dawg.eu> wrote: > I think Andrew had to manually add the windows files due to https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/installer/pull/41. This maybe the reason why the zip version is newer, what's the number The exception from Tango says 78.8. Which seems very high when I look here [1]. zipinfo says "6.3 unx" which seems to indicate version 6.3 and that it was created on Posix. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zip_%28file_format%29#Version_history -- /Jacob Carlborg

January 20, 2014

Re: [dmd-beta] dmd 2.065 beta 1

Posted by Jordi Sayol
in reply to Andrew Edwards

Permalink

Jordi Sayol

Posted in reply to Andrew Edwards

Permalink

On Linux, last beta do not read "/etc/dmd.conf"

----
$ dmd -run hello_world.d
Error: cannot find source code for runtime library file 'object.d'
       dmd might not be correctly installed. Run 'dmd -man' for installation instructions.
Specify path to file 'object.d' with -I switch
----

adding -I switches with the same paths in "/etc/dmd.conf" fix the problem.



BTW, I see that dmd.conf has changed from:

----
[Environment]

DFLAGS=-I%@P%/../../src/phobos -I%@P%/../../src/druntime/import -L-L%@P%/../lib32 -L-L%@P%/../lib64 -L--no-warn-search-mismatch -L--export-dynamic
----

to

----
[Environment32]
DFLAGS=-I%@P%/../../src/phobos -I%@P%/../../src/druntime/import -L-L%@P%/../lib32 -L--export-dynamic

[Environment64]
DFLAGS=-I%@P%/../../src/phobos -I%@P%/../../src/druntime/import -L-L%@P%/../lib64 -L--export-dynamic
----

Should I change deb/rpm packages to these two new sections?

-- 
Jordi Sayol
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
dmd-beta@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

Trying it now on one of the work servers, I'm getting the "dmd: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by dmd)" error. This should be a blocker - IIRC the solution is to build it on an older distro. On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Andrew Edwards <edwards.ac@gmail.com>wrote: > http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.beta.1.zip > > Current list of regressions: > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format= advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_ status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED > > _______________________________________________ > dmd-beta mailing list > dmd-beta@puremagic.com > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta >

On 01/20/2014 04:24 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote: > Trying it now on one of the work servers, I'm getting the "dmd: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by dmd)" error. > > This should be a blocker - IIRC the solution is to build it on an older distro. Same as this http://forum.dlang.org/post/52D6D96D.8010800@yahoo.es. I switched to Debian 6.0.7 for the vagrant images. _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

On 01/20/2014 11:51 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > > The exception from Tango says 78.8. Which seems very high when I look here [1]. zipinfo says "6.3 unx" which seems to indicate version 6.3 and that it was created on Posix. I think this is a bug in Tango. 788 is 0x314 where 0x0300 means Unix and 0x14 == 20 means version 2.0. See here ( http://www.pkware.com/documents/casestudies/APPNOTE.TXT) 4.4.2 version made by (2 bytes). _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

On 21 jan 2014, at 00:16, Martin Nowak <code@dawg.eu> wrote: > I think this is a bug in Tango. > 788 is 0x314 where 0x0300 means Unix and 0x14 == 20 means version 2.0. > See here ( http://www.pkware.com/documents/casestudies/APPNOTE.TXT) > > 4.4.2 version made by (2 bytes). It looks like it's a bug. Either they failed to take into account the platform (the upper byte) or they only support MS-DOS (0). -- /Jacob Carlborg _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

Forums