On Thursday, 21 May 2015 at 17:47:02 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> I will probably implement all variants (final!bool, !final, final(bool),
> default), if I have a enought spare time.

Any plans on turning it into a PR when you're done?

On Thu, 21 May 2015 19:38:17 +0000
Meta via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Thursday, 21 May 2015 at 17:47:02 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> > I will probably implement all variants (final!bool, !final,
> > final(bool),
> > default), if I have a enought spare time.
> 
> Any plans on turning it into a PR when you're done?

Not so far. But if I will be satisfied with any version I could try to make PR.

On Thursday, 21 May 2015 at 19:47:56 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 May 2015 19:38:17 +0000
> Meta via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 21 May 2015 at 17:47:02 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>> > I will probably implement all variants (final!bool, !final, final(bool),
>> > default), if I have a enought spare time.
>> 
>> Any plans on turning it into a PR when you're done?
>
> Not so far. But if I will be satisfied with any version I could try to make PR.

That would be really kind of you. Negation of attributes and rvalue references are the things I miss the most.

On Monday, 18 May 2015 at 21:51:49 UTC, Namespace wrote:
>> Knee-jerk response: if no "return" attribute on a function it should be safe to bind rvalues to ref parameters. Of course that's impractical as a default so explicit "auto ref" would be needed. -- Andrei
>
> Would it be to hasty if someone would start implementing auto ref for non-templates right now? Or should a more experienced user do that? Just in case I can contribute somehow.

I took the liberty to begin with an implementation. Thanks to Kenjiis work, it was not too difficult, I had to adjust only the changes on the new code base:

https://github.com/Dgame/dmd/tree/auto-ref-for-non-templates

Maybe this could be reviewed as soon as 'return ref' is fully implemented.