If you do:

    dmd -c file1.d file2.d etc.d

...you will get multiple .o files (one per .d file). Doing the same with ldmd2 only outputs file1.o. Is that a bug?

On Tuesday, 3 September 2013 at 23:14:14 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
> If you do:
>
>     dmd -c file1.d file2.d etc.d
>
> ...you will get multiple .o files (one per .d file). Doing the same with ldmd2 only outputs file1.o. Is that a bug?

Yes. ldmd2 is a direct replacement for dmd and should behave the same way.

Kai

On Wednesday, 4 September 2013 at 04:36:07 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
> Yes. ldmd2 is a direct replacement for dmd and should behave the same way.

I submitted a bug report on GibHub: Issue #467.