On Monday, 13 February 2017 at 12:26:14 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> I am currently working on && again,
> So far I hit a curious situation when handling
> (b1 && b2 && b3)
> everything works fine except that b3 will be evaluated 3 times.
> It's a puzzler :)

I just reverted every change of last week I should have a clean building branch after that.
Tomorrow I will rewrite the removed functionality more cautiously.

On Monday, 13 February 2017 at 21:09:40 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Monday, 13 February 2017 at 12:26:14 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> I am currently working on && again,
>> So far I hit a curious situation when handling
>> (b1 && b2 && b3)
>> everything works fine except that b3 will be evaluated 3 times.
>> It's a puzzler :)
>
> I just reverted every change of last week I should have a clean building branch after that.
> Tomorrow I will rewrite the removed functionality more cautiously.

I have now rebuild the new structures partially.
It turns out that I was missing a few bailouts.
However those should have been necessary before as well, so I am still puzzled.

On 2017-02-14 10:51, Stefan Koch wrote:

> I have now rebuild the new structures partially.
> It turns out that I was missing a few bailouts.
> However those should have been necessary before as well, so I am still
> puzzled.

301 posts (302 with this one). Time for a new thread?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>301 posts (302 with this one). Time for a new thread?

please, no! i just downloaded 4500+ posts only to get the root of thisthread! don't turn it into useless effort!