July 10, 2003 Re: dmc and Pharlap | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Nic Tiger | "Nic Tiger" <tiger7@progtech.ru> escribió en el mensaje news:bef0q9$bt3$1@digitaldaemon.com... > "Gisle Vanem" <giva@users.sourceforge.net> wrote in message news:bec5me$lql$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > "Gisle Vanem" <giva@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > > > I assume you mean Flashtek's X32 when you say DOSX. > > > Why Pharlap? Because it's far superiour to Flashtek and DOS4GW. > > > Only djgpp/CWSDPMI is better IMHO. > > > > Flashtek is a pile of crap. It fails to run a simple "Hello world" program > > under Win-XP DOS-box. > > I consider WinXP a huge pile of crap. If it doesn't support advanced technique (which previous versions of M$ Windows supported, by the way) it doesn't mean that any software that uses this technique is crap. > > DOSX is fastest and smallest dos extender. I've used it for 4 years (till now) for several huge military class software systems, and I have never had > ANY fault related to DOSX. > > Nic Tiger. > > PMode/W, ZRDX and DOS32/A are smaller. DOS32/A is probably faster. |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation