March 27, 2004 phobos license? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Hi! Walter: I would like to ask you a question? What is the license of Phobos? It seems that under the license that comes with DMD redistribution is not allow. It would be nice if you could release phobos source code under a free software license (for instance, LGPL) so that we can use it to develop free software (For exmaple, GPL'ed code cannot be linked _legally_ with a library whose license doesn't allow redistribution) Best regards, Pablo De Napoli |
March 27, 2004 Re: phobos license? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Pablo De Napoli | It should be under a dual gpl/artistic license. I'll see about fixing it. "Pablo De Napoli" <Pablo_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:c445qi$fnf$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Hi! > > Walter: I would like to ask you a question? What is the > license of > Phobos? > > It seems that under the license that comes with DMD redistribution is not allow. > > It would be nice if you could release phobos source code > under a free software license (for instance, LGPL) > so that we can use it to > develop free software > > (For exmaple, GPL'ed code cannot be linked _legally_ > with a > library whose license doesn't allow redistribution) > > Best regards, > Pablo De Napoli > > |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation