Thread overview
gdmd, gdc?
Apr 22, 2004
eluusive
Apr 22, 2004
Ben Hinkle
April 22, 2004
What's the difference between gdc and gdmd?  I've seen both on here and updates
posted by different
people.  They both seem to be d compilers that interface with gcc somehow.   Am
i confused?

What's DLI also?  Is dli now known as gdmd?  What's going on?!?

I'm so confused.


April 22, 2004
<eluusive@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:c67as1$869$1@digitaldaemon.com
| What's the difference between gdc and gdmd?  I've seen both on here and
updates
| posted by different
| people.  They both seem to be d compilers that interface with gcc somehow.
Am
| i confused?
|
| What's DLI also?  Is dli now known as gdmd?  What's going on?!?
|
| I'm so confused.

(I haven't followed up the names really, so you'll have to excuse me in that
matter)

DLI was written by Burton Radons a long time ago (over a year ago, I think)
as the first D compiler for Linux. It's no longer updated.
gdmd was promoted as being developed, by before it was completed (I think
before it did something really, really important. I know it compiled some
programs but not much else), gdc was announced as being almost fully
functional.
Bottom line is you should download gdc and not worry about anything else.

-----------------------
Carlos Santander Bernal


April 22, 2004
"Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294@msn.com> wrote in message
news:c67h7g$irj$1@digitaldaemon.com
| <eluusive@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
| news:c67as1$869$1@digitaldaemon.com
|| What's the difference between gdc and gdmd?  I've seen both on here and
| updates
|| posted by different
|| people.  They both seem to be d compilers that interface with gcc
somehow.
| Am
|| i confused?
||
|| What's DLI also?  Is dli now known as gdmd?  What's going on?!?
||
|| I'm so confused.
|
| (I haven't followed up the names really, so you'll have to excuse me in
that
| matter)
|
| DLI was written by Burton Radons a long time ago (over a year ago, I
think)
| as the first D compiler for Linux. It's no longer updated.
| gdmd was promoted as being developed, by before it was completed (I think
| before it did something really, really important. I know it compiled some
| programs but not much else), gdc was announced as being almost fully
| functional.
| Bottom line is you should download gdc and not worry about anything else.
|
| -----------------------
| Carlos Santander Bernal

Just FYI, David Friedman is in charge of gdc.

-----------------------
Carlos Santander Bernal


April 22, 2004
<eluusive@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:c67as1$869$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> What's the difference between gdc and gdmd?  I've seen both on here and
updates
> posted by different
> people.  They both seem to be d compilers that interface with gcc somehow.
Am
> i confused?
>
> What's DLI also?  Is dli now known as gdmd?  What's going on?!?
>
> I'm so confused.

You can safely ignore gdmd. I should just remove it from my web site but I figure it is a historical curiosity. The one to use is gdc since it is way way way more complete than gdmd. DLI is probably also obsolete but it might have some nice experimental features or ideas that you could look for if you are curious.

-Ben