May 19, 2004 Re: Trying to build swdf lib | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | Walter wrote: >"J C Calvarese" <jcc7@cox.net> wrote in message >news:c85qmf$234n$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > >>Have you considered creating new files with themes, such as >>std.c.windows.winbase? >> >> > >Yes, but does anybody use them, or do they just include windows.h? > > Dig-Dug uses winbase, although it would have used windows if that was more complete. -- -Anderson: http://badmama.com.au/~anderson/ |
May 20, 2004 Re: Trying to build swdf lib | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to J C Calvarese | "J C Calvarese" <jcc7@cox.net> wrote in message news:c8el6f$b0k$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Walter wrote: > > "J C Calvarese" <jcc7@cox.net> wrote in message news:c85qmf$234n$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > >>Have you considered creating new files with themes, such as std.c.windows.winbase? > > > > > > Yes, but does anybody use them, or do they just include windows.h? > > Is std.c.windows.windows going to stabilize or continue to grow sporadically? Can you mention when you make changes or do we have to find out from unexpected compile errors? I apologize for that. I keep intending to do a complete job of it, and then fall short. > If you'd add new definitions in an orderly fashion, I think it might cause fewer unexpected conflicts for those programmers who have already added those definitions to their own projects. I need to do better with this. |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation