Bug fixes.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

Does this mean utf.d has been changed since 0.95?  And if so, were there any changes to encode/decode?  (just wondering if I should rewrite the changes I made based on what's in 0.96)

Sean

In article <cdphin$171q$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Sean Kelly says...
>
>Does this mean utf.d has been changed since 0.95?  And if so, were there any changes to encode/decode?  (just wondering if I should rewrite the changes I made based on what's in 0.96)

Never mind, they compare the same in a diff.

Sean

On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:42:06 -0700, Walter wrote:

> Bug fixes.
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

from d change log for 0.96
> Added exec* functions to std.process. (thanks to Matthew Wilson)

my linux system doesn't have execvpe,

from http://haskell.cs.yale.edu/ghc/docs/5.02.3/set/process-primitives.html (the first one that come up from google)

"Note that execvpe is not provided by the POSIX standard, and must be written by hand."

do we really want it to be on phobos like it is now?

Ant

DWT from dsource.org still crashes the compiler when I try to compile the project.
Dnia Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:42:06 -0700, Walter <newshound@digitalmars.com> napisał:

> Bug fixes.
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>
>
>



-- 
uno (unodgs@tlen.pl)

Daniel Kos wrote:
> DWT from dsource.org still crashes the compiler when I try to compile the  project.

Ummm. You might want to talk to the DWT team about that: http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=1

(By the way, they've been trying to get it to compile, too.)

> Dnia Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:42:06 -0700, Walter <newshound@digitalmars.com>  napisał:
> 
>> Bug fixes.
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html


-- 
Justin (a/k/a jcc7)
http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/

"Ant" <duitoolkit@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:pan.2004.07.24.21.54.49.545093@yahoo.ca...
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:42:06 -0700, Walter wrote:
>
> > Bug fixes.
> >
> > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>
> from d change log for 0.96
> > Added exec* functions to std.process. (thanks to Matthew Wilson)
>
> my linux system doesn't have execvpe,
>
> from http://haskell.cs.yale.edu/ghc/docs/5.02.3/set/process-primitives.html (the first one that come up from google)
>
> "Note that execvpe is not provided by the POSIX standard, and must be written by hand."
>
> do we really want it to be on phobos like it is now?

Hmm. I guess it needs revisiting.

Walter wrote:

> Bug fixes.
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

"Added std.perf (thanks to Matthew Wilson)"

We have quite a few undocumented bits of Phobos already, but it's something of an occasion to see a whole module undocumented.  Is this going to be fixed soon?

"Fixed mishandling of out parameters in variadic functions."

Unless I keep blinking, I don't see anything on how to use inout/out variadically.  Or is this talking about out among the fixed parameters preceding the ...?

We could actually do with inout/out variadicity, perhaps with the obvious syntax

	void qwert(out ...);

at least if we're going to eventually create a successor to scanf.

And please see

http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D/5809
(sorry, I meant to post that on d.D.bugs)
http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D/5810

Stewart.

-- 
My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox, aside from its being the unfortunate victim of intensive mail-bombing at the moment.  Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.

"Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:ce2n03$oi2$2@digitaldaemon.com...
> Walter wrote:
>
> > Bug fixes.
> >
> > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>
> "Added std.perf (thanks to Matthew Wilson)"
>
> We have quite a few undocumented bits of Phobos already, but it's something of an occasion to see a whole module undocumented.  Is this going to be fixed soon?

Matthew has promised to write the .html bit for it.

> "Fixed mishandling of out parameters in variadic functions."
>
> Unless I keep blinking, I don't see anything on how to use inout/out variadically.  Or is this talking about out among the fixed parameters preceding the ...?

The latter. There was a reported bug with out parameters appearing before the ...


> And please see
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D/5809 (sorry, I meant to post that on d.D.bugs) http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D/5810

Thanks!