Oh no , duh :S.  Hehe it works, sweet!


In article <ch5226$2f0s$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says...
>
>worked for me. Did you get dmd-0.101? Run dmd -v to find out.
>
>"Cappa-Gamma" <Cappa-Gamma_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:ch513r$2em3$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>> Hmmm, compiling this though :
>>
>> ###
>> module foo;
>>
>> import std.stream;
>>
>> void main ()
>> {
>> void function() x, y;
>> x = function void() { stdout.writeLine("X!"); };
>> y = function void()  { stdout.writeLine("Y!"); };
>> x();
>> y();
>> }
>>
>> Gives me the error :
>>
>> c:\dmd\bin\..\..\dm\bin\link.exe foo,,,user32+kernel32/noi;
>> OPTLINK (R) for Win32  Release 7.50B1
>> Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989 - 2001  All Rights Reserved
>>
>> foo.obj(foo)  Offset 001B5H Record Type 00C3
>> Error 1: Previous Definition Different : _D3foo4main0FZv
>> --- errorlevel 1
>>
>> ??
>>
>> Charlie
>>
>>
>> In article <ch4ehp$25sb$2@digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says...
>> >
>> >Stewart Gordon wrote:
>> >
>> >> Walter wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>> >>
>> >> "Function literals can now have same type signature."
>> >>
>> >> Same as what?
>> >>
>> >> Stewart.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Same as each other. I think there was a bug where two function literals
>in
>> >the same scope couldn't have the same signature. So
>> >void foo() {
>> > x = function int(){...};
>> > y = function int(){...};
>> >}
>> >wouldn't compile because of conflicting function names. My guess is
>that's
>> >the bug that got fixed.
>> >
>>
>>
>
>