I'm slightly annoyed by DPaste providing a single ancient LDC version (0.12, 2.063 front-end...). I wouldn't mind as long as it wouldn't boldly state `We provide always up-to-date compilers collection!` and it wasn't the first result when googling for "dlang online compiler" (I prefer d.godbolt.org, which provides recent LDC/GDC versions, but no DMD).

For dmd you can try: http://asm.dlang.org/

Dne 3. 3. 2017 12:27 napsal uživatel "kinke via Digitalmars-d" < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>:

> I'm slightly annoyed by DPaste providing a single ancient LDC version (0.12, 2.063 front-end...). I wouldn't mind as long as it wouldn't boldly state `We provide always up-to-date compilers collection!` and it wasn't the first result when googling for "dlang online compiler" (I prefer d.godbolt.org, which provides recent LDC/GDC versions, but no DMD).
>

On Friday, 3 March 2017 at 11:22:52 UTC, kinke wrote:
> I'm slightly annoyed by DPaste providing a single ancient LDC version (0.12, 2.063 front-end...). I wouldn't mind as long as it wouldn't boldly state `We provide always up-to-date compilers collection!` and it wasn't the first result when googling for "dlang online compiler" (I prefer d.godbolt.org, which provides recent LDC/GDC versions, but no DMD).

FYI: the maintainer of DPaste is very busy and hard to reach. I am trying to get dmd-nightly and a simple cache for dlang.org onto DPaste since last summer.

If you still want to give it a try: https://github.com/nazriel/dpaste-fe