Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
September 23, 2004 dmd 0.102 crash (spooky) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Hi, show the exact following code to dmd 0.102 on Linux and it drops dead instantly. Believe it or not. (Have not tried <0.102.) Swap the definition of Foo(T1) and Bar and it works fine. class Foo() { } class Bar : Foo!() { } class Foo(T1) { } void main() { } Bastiaan. |
September 24, 2004 Re: dmd 0.102 crash (spooky) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Bastiaan Veelo | on my linux machine (Mepis linux) I just get a segfault :)
Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> show the exact following code to dmd 0.102 on Linux and it drops dead instantly. Believe it or not. (Have not tried <0.102.) Swap the definition of Foo(T1) and Bar and it works fine.
>
>
> class Foo()
> {
> }
>
> class Bar : Foo!()
> {
> }
>
> class Foo(T1)
> {
> }
>
> void main()
> {
> }
>
>
> Bastiaan.
|
September 25, 2004 Re: dmd 0.102 crash (spooky) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to clayasaurus | clayasaurus wrote:
> on my linux machine (Mepis linux) I just get a segfault :)
:-) That is what I mean. But it seems to happen very early (during lexical analysis?) because it is not preceded by an error message and changing the order of definitions has a say.
How is Windows doing in this regard?
Bastiaan.
|
September 25, 2004 Re: dmd 0.102 crash (spooky) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Bastiaan Veelo | Bastiaan Veelo wrote: > clayasaurus wrote: > >> on my linux machine (Mepis linux) I just get a segfault :) > > > :-) That is what I mean. But it seems to happen very early (during lexical analysis?) because it is not preceded by an error message and changing the order of definitions has a say. > > How is Windows doing in this regard? No better. Results in GPF on WinXP. > Bastiaan. |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation