Thread overview
Bug or intended?
Feb 06, 2016
rsw0x
Feb 06, 2016
Kagamin
Feb 07, 2016
Marc Schütz
Feb 08, 2016
cy
February 06, 2016
I was playing around with alias templates and came across this, I reduced it to:

---
struct A(alias C c){

  auto foo(){
    return c.i;
  }
}

struct B{
  C c;
  A!c a;
}

struct C{
  int i;
}
---

It gives me a "need 'this' for 'i' of type 'int'" error.
February 06, 2016
I'd say support for this scenario is not implemented yet.
February 07, 2016
The specification doesn't list (non-static) members a valid template alias parameters:
http://dlang.org/spec/template.html#TemplateAliasParameter
February 08, 2016
On Saturday, 6 February 2016 at 14:15:04 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
> I was playing around with alias templates and came across this, I reduced it to:
>
> ---
> struct A(alias C c){
>
>   auto foo(){
>     return c.i;
>   }
> }
>
> struct B{
>   C c;
>   A!c a;
> }
>
> struct C{
>   int i;
> }
> ---
>
> It gives me a "need 'this' for 'i' of type 'int'" error.

I think the "alias C c" you pass actually must be a value "c" of some sort. A!c would have to produce a different A struct, for every c value. (as opposed to A!C which works fine.) So, if you made B with a C with an i = 23, then you'd have an A!(23) and if you made another one with i = 42, you'd have an A!(42).

That doesn't seem very useful, for general integers. Maybe if it was an enum of finite, limited size it'd make sense.