January 27, 2005 Re: DMD 0.112 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to John Demme | "John Demme" <me@teqdruid.com> wrote in message news:ctbhq9$1s5$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Great! Is doing Linux SO's on your list for pre-1.0? (please say yes) I have to figure out how they work first! > Thanks for the profiler. I've been wanting this for awhile. Can't wait to try it. Good. I looked at the source to it, and realized there wasn't any impediment to making it work under Linux. It won't work with gdc, though, it is specific to dmd. |
January 27, 2005 Re: DMD 0.112 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | Walter wrote:
>>Thanks for the profiler. I've been wanting this for awhile. Can't wait
>>to try it.
>
> Good. I looked at the source to it, and realized there wasn't any impediment
> to making it work under Linux. It won't work with gdc, though, it is
> specific to dmd.
That's OK, since GDC can use the GNU profiler instead (just like GCC)
--anders
|
January 31, 2005 Re: DMD 0.112 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | The GC change is very much appreciated, and just what I was looking to do myself; I'll try to get back to digc to incorporate the changes, unless if there is a successor to it now. Hope a Phobos DLL isn't too far away? Let the community handle the problem of getting the DLL distributed to clients. |
January 31, 2005 Re: DMD 0.112 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Burton Radons | "Burton Radons" <burton-radons@smocky.com> wrote in message news:ctk1jr$2lfl$2@digitaldaemon.com... > Hope a Phobos DLL isn't too far away? Let the community handle the problem of getting the DLL distributed to clients. Eventually doing that is a good idea, but it's not going to happen in the very near term. |
February 01, 2005 Re: DMD 0.112 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | "Walter" <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:ctab84$1eui$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Some much requested goodies in Phobos. > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html > With the new dll posibilities in D i went to try the examples. I changed declaration of MyClass to: export MyClass{... Then i thought that in main using this dll i could instead of foo(getMyClass()); do MyClass a = new MyClass; But it isn't possible. I get some linking errors. Is this supposed to work? If so what am i doing wrong? If not, why not? PS. I also tried exporting the constructor but it didn't help. > > |
February 01, 2005 Re: DMD 0.112 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ivan Senji | "Ivan Senji" <ivan.senji@public.srce.hr> wrote in message news:ctnv2j$c39$1@digitaldaemon.com... > "Walter" <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:ctab84$1eui$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > Some much requested goodies in Phobos. > > > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html > > > > With the new dll posibilities in D i went to try the examples. > > I changed declaration of MyClass to: > export MyClass{... > > Then i thought that in main using this dll i could instead of > foo(getMyClass()); > do > MyClass a = new MyClass; > > But it isn't possible. I get some linking errors. > > Is this supposed to work? If so what am i doing wrong? > If not, why not? I'll have to look into this. I'm sure it could be made to work. But in the meantime, just use the getMyClass() approach. |
February 01, 2005 Re: DMD 0.112 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | "Walter" <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:ctoh6i$vv0$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > "Ivan Senji" <ivan.senji@public.srce.hr> wrote in message news:ctnv2j$c39$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > > Is this supposed to work? If so what am i doing wrong? > > If not, why not? > > I'll have to look into this. I'm sure it could be made to work. But in the meantime, just use the getMyClass() approach. > Thanks in advance :) |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation