Menu
Search

Forums

Forum Index

Thread overview
unittest for nested functions?
Apr 20, 2005
Thomas Kuehne
Apr 21, 2005
TechnoZeus
Apr 21, 2005
Thomas Kuehne
Apr 21, 2005
TechnoZeus
April 20, 2005
Gravatar of Thomas KuehnePosted by Thomas KuehneReply
Thomas Kuehne
Gravatar of Thomas Kuehne


Reply
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Should unittest in functions be allowed in future, so that static inner functions can be tested?

# void outer(){
# 	static int inner(){
#		return 0;
#	}
#
#	unittest{
#		assert(inner()==0);
#	}
# }

Thomas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFCZe4h3w+/yD4P9tIRAsZiAKCqXhIB4zSoe5ctT4ALasyXGOZWbwCgqgyP
2FoEwP8wvVW7+OmDwJLUXP0=
=Tgr9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
April 21, 2005
Gravatar of TechnoZeusPosted by TechnoZeus
in reply to Thomas Kuehne		Reply
TechnoZeus
Gravatar of TechnoZeus
Posted in reply to Thomas Kuehne


Reply
Hmmm... Won't this work?...

unittest
{
  function.test();
  assert(foo);
  //etc.
}

TZ


"Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop@kuehne.thisisspam.cn> wrote in message news:1a7hj2-uf6.ln1@lnews.kuehne.cn...
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Should unittest in functions be allowed in future, so that static inner functions can be tested?
>
> # void outer(){
> # static int inner(){
> # return 0;
> # }
> #
> # unittest{
> # assert(inner()==0);
> # }
> # }
>
> Thomas
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iD8DBQFCZe4h3w+/yD4P9tIRAsZiAKCqXhIB4zSoe5ctT4ALasyXGOZWbwCgqgyP
> 2FoEwP8wvVW7+OmDwJLUXP0=
> =Tgr9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
April 21, 2005
Gravatar of Thomas KuehnePosted by Thomas Kuehne
in reply to TechnoZeus		Reply
Thomas Kuehne
Gravatar of Thomas Kuehne
Posted in reply to TechnoZeus


Reply
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

TechnoZeus schrieb am Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:17:18 -0500:
> Hmmm... Won't this work?...
>
> unittest
> {
>   function.test();
>   assert(foo);
>   //etc.
> }
>
> TZ
>
>
> "Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop@kuehne.thisisspam.cn> wrote in message news:1a7hj2-uf6.ln1@lnews.kuehne.cn...
>>
>> Should unittest in functions be allowed in future, so that static inner functions can be tested?
>>
>> # void outer(){
>> # static int inner(){
>> # return 0;
>> # }
>> #
>> # unittest{
>> # assert(inner()==0);
>> # }
>> # }
>>
>> Thomas

Nice catch. BTW where is this documented?

Thomas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFCZzUH3w+/yD4P9tIRAmtJAKDLEsvU5Kn6H+lE5ieti12ayULyOgCfVizx
HVz4XAbnmB91AIwBYQGhmwY=
=v0i6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
April 21, 2005
Gravatar of TechnoZeusPosted by TechnoZeus
in reply to Thomas Kuehne		Reply
TechnoZeus
Gravatar of TechnoZeus
Posted in reply to Thomas Kuehne


Reply
Don't know if it is documented.  It just seemed to make sense.

TZ

"Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop@kuehne.thisisspam.cn> wrote in message news:71pjj2-b54.ln1@lnews.kuehne.cn...
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> TechnoZeus schrieb am Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:17:18 -0500:
> > Hmmm... Won't this work?...
> >
> > unittest
> > {
> >   function.test();
> >   assert(foo);
> >   //etc.
> > }
> >
> > TZ
> >
> >
> > "Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop@kuehne.thisisspam.cn> wrote in message news:1a7hj2-uf6.ln1@lnews.kuehne.cn...
> >>
> >> Should unittest in functions be allowed in future, so that static inner functions can be tested?
> >>
> >> # void outer(){
> >> # static int inner(){
> >> # return 0;
> >> # }
> >> #
> >> # unittest{
> >> # assert(inner()==0);
> >> # }
> >> # }
> >>
> >> Thomas
>
> Nice catch.
> BTW where is this documented?
>
> Thomas
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iD8DBQFCZzUH3w+/yD4P9tIRAmtJAKDLEsvU5Kn6H+lE5ieti12ayULyOgCfVizx
> HVz4XAbnmB91AIwBYQGhmwY=
> =v0i6
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----