Jump to page: 1 2
Thread overview
DMD 0.123
May 11, 2005
Walter
May 11, 2005
Dave
May 11, 2005
Charlie
May 12, 2005
Dejan Lekic
May 12, 2005
Dejan Lekic
May 12, 2005
Shawn Liu
May 14, 2005
Thomas Kuehne
May 12, 2005
bobef
May 12, 2005
pragma
May 13, 2005
Walter
May 13, 2005
Lionello Lunesu
May 13, 2005
Lionello Lunesu
May 13, 2005
Kramer
May 13, 2005
Walter
May 13, 2005
Kramer
May 13, 2005
Vathix
May 13, 2005
Walter
May 11, 2005
The usual <g>.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html



May 11, 2005
In article <d5tvdk$1p7k$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
>
>The usual <g>.
>
>http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>

And thanks once again, Walter!

- Dave


May 11, 2005
Yep , making good headway :).

Charlie

"Dave" <Dave_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:d5tvo3$1pj7$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> In article <d5tvdk$1p7k$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
> >
> >The usual <g>.
> >
> >http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> >
>
> And thanks once again, Walter!
>
> - Dave
>
>


May 12, 2005
I really apriciate Your work Walter.

Hopefully in the nearest future we'll get DMD RPMs for Linux... :)

Kind regards

Dejan

-- 
...........
Dejan Lekic
  http://dejan.lekic.org

May 12, 2005
In article <d5tvdk$1p7k$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
>
>The usual <g>.
>
>http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>
>
>
Great!  Thanks, Walter!

This version is the one attaining to perfect. It is very strong and works fine.

I have detected only one thing so far.
When an "auto" keyword is found in a function, the compiler complains that "no
return at end of function".

- Shawn


May 12, 2005
Dejan Lekic wrote:

> I really apriciate Your work Walter.
> 
> Hopefully in the nearest future we'll get DMD RPMs for Linux... :)

Why wait ?

SRPM is at http://www.algonet.se/~afb/d/dmd-0.123-1.nosrc.rpm
Just add zipfile, salt to taste and rpm --rebuild for a minute.

Will serve:
dmd-0.123-1.i586.rpm
dmd-doc-0.123-1.i586.rpm
phobos-0.123-1.i586.rpm
phobos-contracts-0.123-1.i586.rpm

--anders
May 12, 2005
Walter is holy man :))))))

In article <d5tvdk$1p7k$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
>
>The usual <g>.
>
>http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>
>
>


May 12, 2005
Ahy phobos as separate package? I would prefer single dmd-devel package
which would include all needed libraries...
Sure it's just a matter of taste... :)

-- 
...........
Dejan Lekic
  http://dejan.lekic.org

May 12, 2005
Dejan Lekic wrote:

> Ahy phobos as separate package? I would prefer single dmd-devel package
> which would include all needed libraries...

But "phobos" is required for "dmd", anyway.
(it could have been called something else)

Simple enough to change in the specfile:
http://www.algonet.se/~afb/d/dmd.spec

> Sure it's just a matter of taste... :)

Yes, and of different licenses too... ?
Phobos is zlib, while DMD is proprietary.

--anders
May 12, 2005
In article <d5tvdk$1p7k$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
>
>The usual <g>.
>
>http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>

Walter,
I don't say this nearly enough, but thank you for all your hard work and
dedication to this project.  D has made me twice the programmer I was when I
started using it over a year ago.  I think the D language itself (by itself) has
truely made the most of that difference.  For this, you have my gratitude.

Also, you are one lean, mean, bug-eating machine. :)

- EricAnderton at yahoo
« First   ‹ Prev
1 2