I've been doin this for some time. Now I feel like I'm ready to release something. I've set a few pages about it at http://www.lessequal.com/akide. I will be glad to get some feedback.

On Tue, 17 May 2005 07:48:29 -0400, bobef <bobef_member@pathlink.com> wrote:

> I've been doin this for some time. Now I feel like I'm ready to release
> something. I've set a few pages about it at http://www.lessequal.com/akide. I
> will be glad to get some feedback.

Looks nice, but the download is painfully slow :(

In article <op.sqw4r6m8kcck4r@esi>, Vathix says...
>
>Looks nice, but the download is painfully slow :(

Yes I was afraid so. I asked for project at dsource. Hopefully they will give me some space soon...

-> "it would run/look slow and ugly like linux."

First, Linux can "look" as you like, linux is NOT a window manager. And you can make it looks great. Second, slow??? ahahaha.

Third, I can't try your IDE, I don't have windows. But it surely is a piece of shit.

In article <pan.2005.05.17.13.25.35.491712@wanadoo.fr>, G.Vidal says...
>
>-> "it would run/look slow and ugly like linux."
>
>First, Linux can "look" as you like, linux is NOT a window manager. And you can make it looks great. Second, slow??? ahahaha.

No matter how I make it looks icons are still ugly for me. Start menu or whatever it is called is ugly also. Fonts are ugly also. And I wont waste days to fix all these things... Or weeks ot learn how!

I have red hat 6,7 -> Runs VERY SLOW
I have suse 9 -> Runs SLOW
I have free bsd 4 -> Runs SLOW, little faster that linux
I have windows -> Runs TIMES faster that linux

Linux is copying files faster. But it is not all I do on my pc...
And gcc is times faster on linux but there are enough compilers for windows...

>Third, I can't try your IDE, I don't have windows. But it surely is a piece of shit.
>
>

Surely it is. I just wonder why people who like linux take it so personal when someone doesn't?

Le Tue, 17 May 2005 13:40:05 +0000, bobef a écrit :

> In article <pan.2005.05.17.13.25.35.491712@wanadoo.fr>, G.Vidal says...
>>
>>-> "it would run/look slow and ugly like linux."
>>
>>First, Linux can "look" as you like, linux is NOT a window manager. And you can make it looks great. Second, slow??? ahahaha.
> 
> No matter how I make it looks icons are still ugly for me. Start menu or whatever it is called is ugly also. Fonts are ugly also. And I wont waste days to fix all these things... Or weeks ot learn how!

http://www.lynucs.org/

You'll find thousands of screenshots all differents.
And don't tell me the 3577 shots of the site are all ugly.

> I have red hat 6,7 -> Runs VERY SLOW
> I have suse 9 -> Runs SLOW
> I have free bsd 4 -> Runs SLOW, little faster that linux
> I have windows -> Runs TIMES faster that linux

It's a problem with _your_ computer, not with the linux kernel. You probably have not standart or unrecognized devices, or badly configured.


> Surely it is. I just wonder why people who like linux take it so personal when someone doesn't?

Because.

bobef wrote:
> I've been doin this for some time. Now I feel like I'm ready to release
> something. I've set a few pages about it at http://www.lessequal.com/akide. I
> will be glad to get some feedback.
> 
> 

Nice looking project... but your license is totally bizarre... and would alienate every potential user on this planet in some form or another, including yourself -- see "unwanted users."

It will be a challenge for you to gain support with your tendency for hyperbole.

Oh... and your Linux comments are indeed unfair... not that it matters much: you do have a right to an opinion, however unsubstantiated they be.

-JJR

In article <d6d0vg$34v$1@digitaldaemon.com>, John Reimer says...
>Nice looking project... but your license is totally bizarre... and would alienate every potential user on this planet in some form or another, including yourself -- see "unwanted users."
>


Yes I know :( I will rewrite the license these days. I just wrote some things I don't like and I named people doing them "unwanted users" :) But it is free for anybody you know. I don't want to stop anyone from using it... Exept military of course :)

bobef wrote:
> In article <d6d0vg$34v$1@digitaldaemon.com>, John Reimer says...
> 
>>Nice looking project... but your license is totally bizarre... and would alienate every potential user on this planet in some form or another, including yourself -- see "unwanted users."
>>
> 
> 
> 
> Yes I know :( I will rewrite the license these days. I just wrote some things I
> don't like and I named people doing them "unwanted users" :) But it is free for
> anybody you know. I don't want to stop anyone from using it... Exept military of
> course :)
> 
> 

Just out of curiousity why would you wish to keep millitary users from using it?  (I cringe for the expected answer).

-DavidM

In article <d6d21a$44p$1@digitaldaemon.com>, David Medlock says...
>
>Just out of curiousity why would you wish to keep millitary users from using it?  (I cringe for the expected answer).
>
>-DavidM

I don't like people dropping bombs and killing other people for money (i.e. no reason). I don't like people who doesn't use their brains for good. I don't like people who are destroying good and particulary our planet. I don't people making weapons instead of something good. I don't like people controlling other people with force. And some other things too. This all applies to militaries.