http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/great/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all&sort=fullcpu

Yes, but it is the only language with all the benchmarks coded.

Ant wrote:
> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/great/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all&sort=fullcpu 
> 

"Kyle Furlong" <ky220@umail.ucsb.edu> wrote in message news:d84lvd$2r07$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Yes, but it is the only language with all the benchmarks coded.
>
> Ant wrote:
>> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/great/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all&sort=fullcpu

It's also interesting to compare D with other languages across the
implemented benchmarks:
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/great/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=dlang&lang2=icpp&sort=fullcpu

Ben Hinkle wrote:
> It's also interesting to compare D with other languages across the implemented benchmarks:
> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/great/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=dlang&lang2=icpp&sort=fullcpu

From the looks of that one, memory use is the one crux of the current D.

-- Chris Sauls

"Chris Sauls" <ibisbasenji@gmail.com> wrote in message news:d84pdb$2tki$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Ben Hinkle wrote:
>> It's also interesting to compare D with other languages across the
>> implemented benchmarks:
>> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/great/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=dlang&lang2=icpp&sort=fullcpu
>
> From the looks of that one, memory use is the one crux of the current D.
>
> -- Chris Sauls

It's interesting to note the memory use column seems to be heavily dependent on the startup footprint. For example the "harmonic" test is just

void main(char[][] args)
{
    int i = 0, n = args.length > 1 ? atoi(args[1]) : 10000000;

    double partialSum = 0.0;
    for (int i=1; i<=n; i++) partialSum += 1.0/i;

    writefln("%0.9f",partialSum);
}

and yet it uses 1.92 times the memory of the C++ version. I assume that's due to startup footprint. I guess it's only a rough measurement since the python memory usage for the same test is 28 times the C++.

Kyle Furlong wrote:
> Yes, but it is the only language with all the benchmarks coded.
> 
> Ant wrote:
> 
>> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/great/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all&sort=fullcpu 
>>

no, SML MLton has all the benchmarks coded.

Yes, I didnt see that one at first, thanks for the correction.

clayasaurus wrote:
> Kyle Furlong wrote:
> 
>> Yes, but it is the only language with all the benchmarks coded.
>>
>> Ant wrote:
>>
>>> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/great/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all&sort=fullcpu 
>>>
> 
> 
> no, SML MLton has all the benchmarks coded.

Ben Hinkle wrote:
> "Kyle Furlong" <ky220@umail.ucsb.edu> wrote in message news:d84lvd$2r07$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> 
>>Yes, but it is the only language with all the benchmarks coded.
>>
>>Ant wrote:
>>
>>>http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/great/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all&sort=fullcpu
> 
> 
> It's also interesting to compare D with other languages across the implemented benchmarks:
> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/great/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=dlang&lang2=icpp&sort=fullcpu
> 
> 

sorry for sounding like an idiot, but, can someone decipher that chart for me? :P

"Hasan Aljudy" <hasan.aljudy@gmail.com> wrote in message news:d855mu$7gb$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Ben Hinkle wrote:
>> "Kyle Furlong" <ky220@umail.ucsb.edu> wrote in message news:d84lvd$2r07$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>>
>>>Yes, but it is the only language with all the benchmarks coded.
>>>
>>>Ant wrote:
>>>
>>>>http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/great/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all&sort=fullcpu
>>
>>
>> It's also interesting to compare D with other languages across the
>> implemented benchmarks:
>> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/great/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=dlang&lang2=icpp&sort=fullcpu
>>
>>
>
> sorry for sounding like an idiot, but, can someone decipher that chart for me? :P

larger numbers are bad. So if the plot has bars extending to the left (the D side) then D was performing worse than Intel C++ (black for memory, white for time). The table of numbers below the chart has the ratio of the two languages. So for example if you have a number 30 for the memory usage of a test foo then it means foo took up 30 more memory implemented in D than C++.

On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 10:36:49 -0700, Kyle Furlong wrote:

> Yes, but it is the only language with all the benchmarks coded.
> 
> Ant wrote:
>> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/great/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all&sort=fullcpu
>>

Hi I have made at a program to find the test where D is performing pure.

For cpu time the 10 worst different test is 0.02941 objinst(1500000) 0.03846 message(150) 0.06452 echo(40000) 0.08333 except(100000) 0.12360 regexmatch(12000) 0.23529 prodcons(100000) 0.25000 ary(5000) 0.32143 hello(150) 0.40000 random(600000) 0.41176 matrix(600)

for memory it is 0.00338 fibo(12) 0.00529 except(100000) 0.01717 ackermann(7) 0.03078 hash2(150) 0.03909 sieve(1200) 0.06250 fasta(2500000) 0.06566 ary(5000) 0.07426 nestedloop(12) 0.07937 except(200000) 0.08371 strcat(40000)

for code lines it is 0.04000 wordfreq(10) 0.05263 wc(1500) 0.07143 reversefile(10) 0.10345 lists(12) 0.16327 process(1000) 0.16667 nestedloop(12) 0.16667 sumcol(1000) 0.22472 pidigits(200) 0.28302 message(100) 0.29412 objinst(1000000)

The number in front is (best non d benchmark)/(d benchmark)