firebird - firebird.zip - D Programming Language Discussion Forum

using the firebird direct interface makes things a lot faster. i just started to convert the header and it is probably full of mistakes and errors. you need to get the lib (convert them) and dlls from firebird 1.5. the sample in main works. rko

please use that for what ever reason you guys like. the header file i tried to convert is actually from the upcomming version 2.0, but it is beta now. it will work with that 2.0 beta but that has problems. you should use the stable 1.52 and when 2.0 is released, convert the 2.0 libs and it should work too. rko In article <dajrdu$1k5h$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Dejan Lekic says... > > >It would be very nice if You add Firebird support to the DDBI project. More about it on http://jeremy.cowgar.com/ddbi/ . > >Kind regards > >-- >........... >Dejan Lekic > http://dejan.lekic.org >

Thanks for those files. I'm not too confident of my abilities but I'll see if I can make sense of it. Is it that essentially no one else is doing this? That makes me second guess what I thought was a great idea... ;) Mark "rko" <rko_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:daj18v$1037$1@digitaldaemon.com... > using the firebird direct interface makes things a lot faster. i just > started to > convert the header > and it is probably full of mistakes and errors. you need to get the lib > (convert > them) and dlls > from firebird 1.5. the sample in main works. > > rko

no, we use firebird in one of the german heathcard projects, but with a different language. we finally got the goahead to start a comparision with d - and a fast native firebird interface. even if we do not keep d, we will keep the native interface. if it is of any use?? i do not know - for us it is. rko In article <dajs4p$1ki9$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Mark Delano says... > >Thanks for those files. I'm not too confident of my abilities but I'll see >if I can make sense of it. Is it that essentially no one >else is doing this? That makes me second guess what I thought was a great >idea... ;) > >Mark > >"rko" <rko_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:daj18v$1037$1@digitaldaemon.com... >> using the firebird direct interface makes things a lot faster. i just >> started to >> convert the header >> and it is probably full of mistakes and errors. you need to get the lib >> (convert >> them) and dlls >> from firebird 1.5. the sample in main works. >> >> rko > >

July 07, 2005

Re: firebird - firebird.zip

Posted by rko
in reply to rko

Permalink

rko

Posted in reply to rko

Permalink

a little test prog without the db

rko


// **************************************************
//
// Project Created 4 / 6 / 2004
// Created By
//
// **************************************************

import std.stdio;
import std.string;
import std.c.windows.windows;
import diCrPKI;
import sqlclass;


db thisdb;
char[] szDSN = "IDENTITY";     // Data Source Name buffer
char[] szUID = "sysdba";      // User ID buffer
char[] szPasswd = "masterkey";// Password buffer
char[] szSqlStr= "select praxisname from arzt where arztnummer = 1" ;
char szModel[256];            // Model buffer
static ubyte[256] res;
int ret;

uint ARZTNUMMER;
uint LAUFENDENUMMER;
char[] FACHGUPPE1;
char[] sql = "select * from arzt where ARZTNUMMER = 5 and laufendenummer = 1\0";
int nMajor, nMinor;

int main ( char [] [] args ) {

PKI_Version(&nMajor, &nMinor);
printf(">|  %i %i\n", nMajor,nMinor);
db thisdb = new db;
ret = thisdb.DataSource(szDSN, szUID, szPasswd);
printf(">|  %i %s\n", ret,toStringz(szDSN));

ret = thisdb.ExecSQL(sql);
printf(">|  %i\n", ret);

ret = thisdb.Bindc(1, &ARZTNUMMER);
printf(">|  %i\n", ret);
ret = thisdb.Bindc(2, &LAUFENDENUMMER);
printf(">|  %i\n", ret);
ret = thisdb.Bindc(3, 60, FACHGUPPE1);
printf(">|  %i\n", ret);

ret = thisdb.GetRow();
printf(">|  %i\n", ret);

//  FACHGUPPE1 = thisdb.GetStringField(3, 60);

printf(" %s  |  %i  |  %i\n", toStringz(FACHGUPPE1), ARZTNUMMER,LAUFENDENUMMER);
delete thisdb;

dbinfo thisdb1 = new dbinfo(szDSN, szUID, szPasswd);

thisdb1.GetCatalog(szUID);
return 1;
}


In article <dajt9m$1l7q$1@digitaldaemon.com>, rko says...
>
>no, we use firebird in one of the german heathcard projects, but with a different language. we finally got the goahead to start a comparision with d - and a fast native firebird interface. even if we do not keep d, we will keep the native interface. if it is of any use?? i do not know - for us it is.
>
>rko
>
>
>
>In article <dajs4p$1ki9$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Mark Delano says...
>>
>>Thanks for those files.  I'm not too confident of my abilities but I'll see
>>if I can make sense of it.  Is it that essentially no one
>>else is doing this?  That makes me second guess what I thought was a great
>>idea... ;)
>>
>>Mark
>>
>>"rko" <rko_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:daj18v$1037$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>>> using the firebird direct interface makes things a lot faster. i just
>>> started to
>>> convert the header
>>> and it is probably full of mistakes and errors. you need to get the lib
>>> (convert
>>> them) and dlls
>>> from firebird 1.5. the sample in main works.
>>>
>>> rko
>>
>>
>
>

I will not use it anyway because I do not use Firebird at all - just MySQL and SQLite. I thought You would like to contribute to the excellent DDBI project... -- ........... Dejan Lekic http://dejan.lekic.org

i wrote an email to tell him that - if he want use it, no string are attached - to go ahead. rko In article <dajv94$1mph$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Dejan Lekic says... > > >I will not use it anyway because I do not use Firebird at all - just MySQL and SQLite. I thought You would like to contribute to the excellent DDBI project... > >-- >........... >Dejan Lekic > http://dejan.lekic.org >

In article <dajt9m$1l7q$1@digitaldaemon.com>, rko says... > >no, we use firebird in one of the german heathcard projects, but with a different language. we finally got the goahead to start a comparision with d - and a fast native firebird interface. even if we do not keep d, we will keep the native interface. if it is of any use?? i do not know - for us it is. > Just curious - what would this comparison consist of? LOC / Man-Month Bugs / LOC Performance etc... Or just kind-of "hmmm - the developers like language X the best". Thanks, - Dave >rko > > > >In article <dajs4p$1ki9$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Mark Delano says... >> >>Thanks for those files. I'm not too confident of my abilities but I'll see >>if I can make sense of it. Is it that essentially no one >>else is doing this? That makes me second guess what I thought was a great >>idea... ;) >> >>Mark >> >>"rko" <rko_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:daj18v$1037$1@digitaldaemon.com... >>> using the firebird direct interface makes things a lot faster. i just >>> started to >>> convert the header >>> and it is probably full of mistakes and errors. you need to get the lib >>> (convert >>> them) and dlls >>> from firebird 1.5. the sample in main works. >>> >>> rko >> >> > >

In article <dak03r$1neu$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Dave says... > >In article <dajt9m$1l7q$1@digitaldaemon.com>, rko says... >> >>no, we use firebird in one of the german heathcard projects, but with a different language. we finally got the goahead to start a comparision with d - and a fast native firebird interface. even if we do not keep d, we will keep the native interface. if it is of any use?? i do not know - for us it is. >> > >Just curious - what would this comparison consist of? running it (native firebird versus odbc) in our OLD language (25 yards old). > >LOC / Man-Month >Bugs / LOC >Performance >etc... > >Or just kind-of "hmmm - the developers like language X the best". the java programmers we have, are more comfortable with d than with c++ - including my enforced preferences. this is, i admit, an unfair - i want decision. me d, most java, some c++ - highest card beats lowest. rko > >Thanks, > >- Dave > >>rko >> >> >> >>In article <dajs4p$1ki9$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Mark Delano says... >>> >>>Thanks for those files. I'm not too confident of my abilities but I'll see >>>if I can make sense of it. Is it that essentially no one >>>else is doing this? That makes me second guess what I thought was a great >>>idea... ;) >>> >>>Mark >>> >>>"rko" <rko_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:daj18v$1037$1@digitaldaemon.com... >>>> using the firebird direct interface makes things a lot faster. i just >>>> started to >>>> convert the header >>>> and it is probably full of mistakes and errors. you need to get the lib >>>> (convert >>>> them) and dlls >>>> from firebird 1.5. the sample in main works. >>>> >>>> rko >>> >>> >> >> > >

Forums