In article <dh8gj0$tl4$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Dejan Lekic says...
>
>
>> 
>> You dont like tortoise  http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ ?
>> 
>
>He probably does not if his OS of choice is _not_ Windows...

That's the other side of the coin.  The combination of quality and portability really is lacking for subversion-based tools.  Especially when compared to offerings for more mature technologies like CVS.

- EricAnderton at yahoo

yah i had the same problems with tortoise and threw it away for a long time, but the latest version is pretty cool.


pragma wrote:
> In article <dh6jrm$2dt0$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Charles says...
> 
>>
>>>I'll add that while SVN's line-command tools work great, the GUI-based
>>
>>offerings
>>
>>>aren't so hot.  There's definately plenty of elbow room for a quality
>>
>>product to
>>
>>>take over in that niche.
>>
>>You dont like tortoise  http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ ?
> 
> 
> Nope, I don't like tortoise. ;)
> 
> I was burned by an installation I had of tortoise some time ago.  It caused
> explorer to behave oddly (crashed frequently) and it seemed to eat tons of CPU
> cycles when I wasn't even doing anything.  Uninstallation also wasn't 100%
> clean, and still left explorer in an unstable state.  
> 
> Honestly, it may have been more an issue with my particular system than anything
> else.  To be fair, all this was on a slow machine (400Mhz) so that could have
> been a factor too.  I may give it another shot sometime soon, probably right
> before I reinstall/upgrade to WinXP.
> 
> I've since moved on to RapidSVN which works well enough, but has some
> showstoppers in the tree-view control.  Also, the way it terms certain things
> ("add working copy" or "add repository") are unintutive and flat-out confusing
> for the beginner.
> 
> - EricAnderton at yahoo

I agree but I do not have that problem personally - i am using "svn" on both platforms. Mostly because GUIs allways are missing something svn, console client, has for years... :)

-- 
...........
Dejan Lekic
  http://dejan.lekic.org