When /** ditto */ is used, the declaration it refers to should be added
to the list for highlighting. It's not uncommon for closely related functions to have different names -- eg C has exp(), expf() and expl().
eg.

/*********************************
 * comments for funcA and funcB
 * funcA is highlighted (underlined),
 * but funcB is not, although I think it should be.
 */
int funcA(int x)
{
}

/** ditto */
int funcB(int x)
{
}

In article <dj7to1$1qjp$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Don Clugston says...
>
>When /** ditto */ is used, the declaration it refers to should be added
>to the list for highlighting. It's not uncommon for closely related
>functions to have different names -- eg C has exp(), expf() and expl().

This would be quite nice for template specializations as well.  Also, is there any way to have enum parameters display correctly?

enum Enum {
VAL_1,
VAL_2
}

template fn(Enum e : Enum.VAL_1) {
fn() {}
}

In DDoc, this will display as:

template fn( (Enum) 0 );


Sean

"Don Clugston" <dac@nospam.com.au> wrote in message news:dj7to1$1qjp$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> When /** ditto */ is used, the declaration it refers to should be added
> to the list for highlighting. It's not uncommon for closely related
> functions to have different names -- eg C has exp(), expf() and expl().

Yes, that's a ddoc bug.

"Sean Kelly" <sean@f4.ca> wrote in message news:dj8mvc$2rrt$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> In DDoc, this will display as:
>
> template fn( (Enum) 0 );

I know. That's another bug.