Does anyone know if dmc will work with this code (which used to be Rogue Wave
code)?

Its not in the Platforms list, but I wonder if the build infrastructure commited here http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=349027&view=rev could be adapted.

Anyhow, more variety of template tests is better than less.

Be nice to know if the compiler could handle ntl and the Ultimate++ (upp) code too.  Not least, upp is a pretty nice IDE and toolset.

James

James Mansion wrote:
> Does anyone know if dmc will work with this code (which used to be Rogue Wave
> code)?

Tools.h++ ?

I have used it in combination with zApp in various projects with DMC without problems but that is 2-3 years ago.

I know the recent releases of the compiler (with the new name lookup) reported some issues with the version of tools.h++ used in those projects.

I would just give it try.

Arjan

> 
> Its not in the Platforms list, but I wonder if the build infrastructure commited
> here http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=349027&view=rev could be adapted.
> 
> Anyhow, more variety of template tests is better than less.
> 
> Be nice to know if the compiler could handle ntl and the Ultimate++ (upp) code
> too.  Not least, upp is a pretty nice IDE and toolset.
> 
> James
> 
> 

Tools.h++ indeed used to compile fine DMC++ (and Symantec C++ for that matter) they had a focus to be usable with a lot of compilers. I do not recall that I had to do a LOT of patching, not even when I worked for Rogue Wave for 3+ months to release their latest version of zApp.

With the newer compiler with stricter type-casting and name-lookup you might have to patch a couple of things as mentioned by Arjan.

Jan



James Mansion wrote:
> Does anyone know if dmc will work with this code (which used to be Rogue Wave
> code)?
> 
> Its not in the Platforms list, but I wonder if the build infrastructure commited
> here http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=349027&view=rev could be adapted.
> 
> Anyhow, more variety of template tests is better than less.
> 
> Be nice to know if the compiler could handle ntl and the Ultimate++ (upp) code
> too.  Not least, upp is a pretty nice IDE and toolset.
> 
> James
> 
> 

-- 
ManiaC++
Jan Knepper

But as for me and my household, we shall use Mozilla...
www.mozilla.org