Menu
Search

Forums

Forum Index

Thread overview
Boost status update
Jul 07, 2006
Arjan
Jul 07, 2006
Pavel Vozenilek
Jul 07, 2006
Arjan
Jul 07, 2006
Arjan
Jul 07, 2006
Walter Bright
Jul 09, 2006
Pavel Vozenilek
Jul 10, 2006
Arjan
July 07, 2006
Gravatar of ArjanPosted by ArjanReply
Arjan
Gravatar of Arjan


Reply
8.49.2 vs 8.48.10

see http://www.digitalmars.com/~arjan/boost/status/dmc8492/cs-dmc.html

Arjan
July 07, 2006
Gravatar of Pavel VozenilekPosted by Pavel Vozenilek
in reply to Arjan		Reply
Pavel Vozenilek
Gravatar of Pavel Vozenilek
Posted in reply to Arjan


Reply
"Arjan" wrote:

> 8.49.2 vs 8.48.10
>
> see http://www.digitalmars.com/~arjan/boost/status/dmc8492/cs-dmc.html
>

That's /very/ useful tool.


I was told that Metacom had switched their tests
week ago but nothing is visible. I planned to set
something like this but didn't find enough of courage.

/Pavel
July 07, 2006
Gravatar of ArjanPosted by Arjan
in reply to Pavel Vozenilek		Reply
Arjan
Gravatar of Arjan
Posted in reply to Pavel Vozenilek
Attachments:


Reply
Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
> "Arjan" wrote:
> 
>> 8.49.2 vs 8.48.10
>>
>> see http://www.digitalmars.com/~arjan/boost/status/dmc8492/cs-dmc.html
>>
> 
> That's /very/ useful tool.
> 
> 
> I was told that Metacom had switched their tests
> week ago but nothing is visible. I planned to set
> something like this but didn't find enough of courage.
> 
> /Pavel
> 
> 

I know what you mean ;-) Took me quite some time before I had it going.

Attached a zip containing my modification to boost tools/build/v1/dmc-*
and 2 command scripts.
Extract in boost root dir.
Run from the status dir dmcstatus.cmd. After a while a few crashed
asserts etc there will new cs-win32-*.html files.

Arjan
July 07, 2006
Gravatar of ArjanPosted by Arjan
in reply to Arjan		Reply
Arjan
Gravatar of Arjan
Posted in reply to Arjan
Attachments:


Reply
oops wrong attachement
July 07, 2006
Gravatar of Walter BrightPosted by Walter Bright
in reply to Arjan		Reply
Walter Bright
Gravatar of Walter Bright
Posted in reply to Arjan


Reply
Arjan wrote:
> 8.49.2 vs 8.48.10
> 
> see http://www.digitalmars.com/~arjan/boost/status/dmc8492/cs-dmc.html
> 
> Arjan

This is great for checking the status.

It looks like the column labeled 8.48.10 should be 8.49.1 ? I didn't think 8.48.10 passed any of the type_traits tests.
July 09, 2006
Gravatar of Pavel VozenilekPosted by Pavel Vozenilek
in reply to Arjan		Reply
Pavel Vozenilek
Gravatar of Pavel Vozenilek
Posted in reply to Arjan


Reply
"Arjan" wrote:

> 8.49.2 vs 8.48.10
>
> see http://www.digitalmars.com/~arjan/boost/status/dmc8492/cs-dmc.html
>

It would be useful to define BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG
macro value, e.g. inside boost/detail/workaround.hpp.

That would get rid few DMC related workarounds
in Boost code. They may be obsolete currently
or may hide fixeable bugs.

/Pavel
July 10, 2006
Gravatar of ArjanPosted by Arjan
in reply to Pavel Vozenilek		Reply
Arjan
Gravatar of Arjan
Posted in reply to Pavel Vozenilek


Reply
Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
> "Arjan" wrote:
> 
>> 8.49.2 vs 8.48.10
>>
>> see http://www.digitalmars.com/~arjan/boost/status/dmc8492/cs-dmc.html
>>
> 
> It would be useful to define BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG
> macro value, e.g. inside boost/detail/workaround.hpp.
> 
> That would get rid few DMC related workarounds
> in Boost code. They may be obsolete currently
> or may hide fixeable bugs.
> 
> /Pavel
> 
> 

Good tip!
Will rerun the regression test with -DBOOST_STRICT_CONFIG for both last beta and 8.48.

Arjan