November 27, 2006 Re: Using <> for opCmp | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Bruno Medeiros | Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>
> Sure is kinda funny when we start using emoticons for operators... ^^
>
I can't wait to see what kind of functionality can be provided using the Homer Simpson operator:
~(_8^(|)
Maybe it can be some sort of exception-handling operator. D'oh!!!
--benji
|
November 27, 2006 Re: Using <> for opCmp | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Benji Smith | Benji Smith wrote:
> Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>>
>> Sure is kinda funny when we start using emoticons for operators... ^^
>>
>
> I can't wait to see what kind of functionality can be provided using the Homer Simpson operator:
>
> ~(_8^(|)
>
> Maybe it can be some sort of exception-handling operator. D'oh!!!
>
> --benji
Oooo, make it a D easter egg?! <g>
|
November 28, 2006 Re: Using <> for opCmp | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kyle Furlong | Kyle Furlong wrote: <snip> > Oooo, make it a D easter egg?! <g> What's the point of hiding Easter eggs if we've already found them? Stewart. -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/M d- s:-@ C++@ a->--- UB@ P+ L E@ W++@ N+++ o K-@ w++@ O? M V? PS- PE- Y? PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++++ h-- r-- !y ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox. Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit. |
November 28, 2006 Re: Using <> for opCmp | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Anders F Björklund | Anders F Björklund wrote: > Bruno Medeiros wrote: > >>> Think it was suggested before, but the language wasn't taking in any >>> more operators at the time ? (The other one was ^^ for logical Xor.) >> >> Sure is kinda funny when we start using emoticons for operators... ^^ > > Must be getting old (or not around the globe enough), hadn't seen those. > > (You too ? Look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verticon for the {^_^} ) > > --anders I don't understand the logic sequence between those two sentences: you say you don't know that emoticon, but then you should you do, and ask if I don't know the emoticon? ... Huh? Of course I know. Confusion ensues :P ) -- Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D |
November 28, 2006 Re: Using <> for opCmp | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Bruno Medeiros | Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> I don't understand the logic sequence between those two sentences: you say you don't know that emoticon, but then you should you do, and ask if I don't know the emoticon? ... Huh? Of course I know. Confusion ensues :P )
Nah, I meant "if someone else needs to look it up, here's a link".
As in someone reading it other than the original poster, i.e. you.
Sorry for the confusion, it got pasted together... :-) ^_^ (-:
--anders
|
November 28, 2006 Re: Using <> for opCmp | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Stewart Gordon | Stewart Gordon wrote:
> Kyle Furlong wrote:
> <snip>
>> Oooo, make it a D easter egg?! <g>
>
> What's the point of hiding Easter eggs if we've already found them?
>
> Stewart.
>
We (early adopters) hide easter eggs for the new converts of 1.0 and beyond.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation