Walter Bright escribió:
> Cleanup of compile time function execution issues.
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> 
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.007.zip

The zip file is gone. What happened?

-- 
Carlos Santander Bernal

"Walter Bright" <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:erh7kb$1i0s$2@digitalmars.com...
> Hasan Aljudy wrote:
>> It's considered a bug though, isn't it? this dependency on the order of declaration ...
>
> It'll be a while before that all gets sorted out.

And therefore a while before 102/282/912 gets sorted out as well?  Sigh.. I hate forward declarations.

Jari-Matti Mäkelä wrote:
> It also seems the downloads got a bit faster! :) On average 55
> kB/s vs old 7 kB/s.

I noticed the faster downloads too. It was about 160+ kB/s for me, which is about 10 times faster than it was previously :).

== Quote from Carlos Santander (csantander619@gmail.com)'s article
> Walter Bright escribió:
> > Cleanup of compile time function execution issues.
> >
> > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> >
> > http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.007.zip
> The zip file is gone. What happened?

I've noticed the same problem.

And "http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.zip" seems to contain DMD 1.006.

Walter Bright wrote:
> Cleanup of compile time function execution issues.
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> 
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.007.zip

small thing,

http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.007.zip is a 404 for me, so I downloaded dmd.zip

I think the version number in dmd --help still says 1.006 -- did I get the right file?

kenny kirjoitti:
> Walter Bright wrote:
>> Cleanup of compile time function execution issues.
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>>
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.007.zip
> 
> small thing,
> 
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.007.zip is a 404 for me, so I downloaded dmd.zip
> 
> I think the version number in dmd --help still says 1.006 -- did I get the right file?

It has been deleted, I guess. It was there, but not anymore.

Walter Bright wrote:
> Cleanup of compile time function execution issues.
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> 
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.007.zip

Thanks for nailing #968.

-- 
- EricAnderton at yahoo

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> "Walter Bright" <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:erh7kb$1i0s$2@digitalmars.com...
> 
>>Hasan Aljudy wrote:
>>
>>>It's considered a bug though, isn't it? this dependency on the order of declaration ...
>>
>>It'll be a while before that all gets sorted out.
> 
> 
> And therefore a while before 102/282/912 gets sorted out as well?  Sigh.. I hate forward declarations. 
> 
> 
not to mention the order dependency of overloaded function lookup;

void foo(){}
void foo(int i){}

auto fnp = &foo;

//swap foo's and the type of fnp changes

torhu wrote:
> I get errors like this with DWT.  They go away when I add -v1 to the command line.  I didn't see this in the changelog, but I guess it's the disallowing implicit conversion from objects to void* that was discussed.
> 
> dwt\accessibility\accessible.d(507): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (cast(IUnknown)(this.objIAccessible)) of type std.c.windows.com.IUnknown to void*
> 
> C:\prog\dmd\import\dwt\ole\win32\oleclientsite.d(544): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (cast(IAdviseSink)(this.iAdviseSink)) of type dwt.internal.oe.win32.OBJIDL.IAdviseSink to void*

Compiling with -v1 or putting in a cast(void*) should resolve the problem.

Touch.  It's still missing.

jcc7 wrote:
> == Quote from Carlos Santander (csantander619@gmail.com)'s article
>> Walter Bright escribió:
>>> Cleanup of compile time function execution issues.
>>>
>>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>>>
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.007.zip
>> The zip file is gone. What happened?
> 
> I've noticed the same problem.
> 
> And "http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.zip" seems to contain DMD 1.006.