Era Scarecrow:

>> It's not worth the unsafety of the whole switch.
>
>  What? I'd need a little explanation what you'd mean.

I meant that semantically clean language features help avoid
troubles later while you program :-)



> besides, 'switch with' and 'with switch' are practically
> identical... aren't they?

Yeah, they are practically identical, that's my point. But 'with
switch' allows you to to not allow code after the switch, so
allows to keep switch syntax cleaner :-)

Bye,
bearophile