August 11, 2007
Brad Roberts wrote:
> Lutger wrote:
>> Ok, will do. I don't think this is as much of a project to put it in dsource, but some webpage would be better indeed.
> 
> Simple projects have a habit growing beyond their original scope. :)

I agree. I wrote obj2asm originally as a quick hack. It has grown into quite a full featured program (but internally it's still an awful mess).
August 11, 2007
Bill Baxter wrote:
> I suspect the reason might be these weird lines I'm getting in my profile:
> 
> ------------------
>         _D8rbftools3api475__T18Kernel_Eva䳡椀渀䘀 甀渀吀匀耀꤀㔀㠀耀ꠀ 䬀 䈀愀猀椀挀䘀吀漀爀匀㌀ 㘀耀ꄀ㈀㄀爀㈀氀漀最爀开攀耀 쐀elemVh2Z€З€Ṫ63€× 1KDDeriv€ุ40€Ø5€ظdd€Ŗöꖀ耀ᰀ耄ﴀᇿ됀8€Ü3Āﴀ烿y51傶耀଀渀 漀洀椀愀氀Ѐ 䀀ŠVE€©9€ŖOr€Ú1Z€
> ------------------
> 
> There are quite a few lines like that in the trace.log dmd is spitting out.

The weird names are the result of the compiler trying to reduce the length of them so they'll fit in the obj file format.
August 11, 2007
Bill Baxter wrote:
 > I tried it but here's what I got:
> 
>  >ptrace -t=profile.d
> Reading from trace.log and writing to profile.d
> tango.core.Exception.IllegalArgumentException: Integer.toInt :: numeric overflow
> 
> 
> That was what finally came out after a long time waiting.
> 
> I suspect the reason might be these weird lines I'm getting in my profile:
> 
> ------------------
>         _D8rbftools3api475__T18Kernel_Eva䳡椀渀䘀 甀渀吀匀耀꤀㔀㠀耀ꠀ 䬀 䈀愀猀椀挀䘀吀漀爀匀㌀ 㘀耀ꄀ㈀㄀爀㈀氀漀最爀开攀耀 쐀elemVh2Z€З€Ṫ63€× 1KDDeriv€ุ40€Ø5€ظdd€Ŗöꖀ耀ᰀ耄ﴀᇿ됀8€Ü3Āﴀ烿y51傶耀଀渀 漀洀椀愀氀Ѐ 䀀ŠVE€©9€ŖOr€Ú1Z€
> ------------------
> 
> There are quite a few lines like that in the trace.log dmd is spitting out.
> 
> --bb

Thanks for mentioning. I have updated this random tarball with some fixes and other improvements, performance should also be ok now :) http://lutger.ifastnet.com/ptrace/ptrace_win.zip

If you come across such a problem again, if it's possible for you to send me your trace.log that would be really helpful: lutger dot blijdestijn at gmail dot com

When I get it in dsource, I'll make it a bit nicer.



August 12, 2007
Reply to BCS,

> Reply to Lutger,
> 
>> BCS wrote:
>> 
>>> their's always scrapple.
>>> 
>>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/scrapple
>>> 
>> Maybe that's a good idea. About scrapple, will you consider lodepng
>> for inclusion? I think it's scope is too small for a project of it's
>> own, but moving it to dsource would be nice. Thanks.
>> 
> shure, I've already got tinyjpg.
> 

If you need access just send me a dsource username


1 2
Next ›   Last »