Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already.
Reply here, or if you'd like to keep the noise on the NG down, just respond with this no-reg-required poll:

   http://www.billbaxter.com/tmp/d2poll.html

--bb

Not using 2.x, because I use tango, which doesn't yet support 2.x.

-Steve

"Bill Baxter" wrote
> Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already.
> Reply here, or if you'd like to keep the noise on the NG down, just
> respond with this no-reg-required poll:
>
>    http://www.billbaxter.com/tmp/d2poll.html
>
> --bb

Reply to Bill,

> Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already.
> Reply here, or if you'd like to keep the noise on the NG down, just
> respond with this no-reg-required poll:
> http://www.billbaxter.com/tmp/d2poll.html
> 
> --bb
> 

NO, All my d work at the moment is intended to survive for a while. As such 2.0's moving target is "not good".

On 10/16/07, Bill Baxter <dnewsgroup@billbaxter.com> wrote:
> Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already. Reply here

Yes

Bill Baxter wrote:
> Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already.
> Reply here, or if you'd like to keep the noise on the NG down, just respond with this no-reg-required poll:
> 
>    http://www.billbaxter.com/tmp/d2poll.html
> 
> --bb

I started a project a while back that requires __traits, but these days I'm using Tango.

Bill Baxter wrote:
> Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already.
> Reply here, or if you'd like to keep the noise on the NG down, just respond with this no-reg-required poll:
> 
>     http://www.billbaxter.com/tmp/d2poll.html
> 
> --bb

The two libraries I maintain both support both 1.x and 2.x.  But I don't use 2.x in apps just yet.

Bill Baxter schrieb:
> Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already.
> Reply here, or if you'd like to keep the noise on the NG down, just
> respond with this no-reg-required poll:
> 
>    http://www.billbaxter.com/tmp/d2poll.html
> 
> --bb

Tangouser => D1

But as soon as tango makes the switch to D2, i am also using D2.

Bill Baxter Wrote:

> Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already.
> Reply here, or if you'd like to keep the noise on the NG down, just
> respond with this no-reg-required poll:
> 
>     http://www.billbaxter.com/tmp/d2poll.html
> 
> --bb

I'm using 2.0. I started with it because there didn't seem any point using the older version. I get some new features I want to play with.
I have had no worries about it being a moving target. It doesn't move that fast. I've never tried Tango because Phobos is the standard library so naturally I started with that. However, I have yet to cut my teeth on a really big public facing project.

Bruce.

"Bill Baxter" <dnewsgroup@billbaxter.com> wrote in message news:ff37lh$2kej$1@digitalmars.com...
> Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already.
> Reply here, or if you'd like to keep the noise on the NG down, just
> respond with this no-reg-required poll:
>
>    http://www.billbaxter.com/tmp/d2poll.html
>
> --bb

No, Tango + hate const = D1 for me, at least until those are solved.  There isn't _that_ much in D2 to draw me over anyway.  Const sure isn't it.

Bill Baxter wrote:
> Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already.
> Reply here, or if you'd like to keep the noise on the NG down, just respond with this no-reg-required poll:
> 
>    http://www.billbaxter.com/tmp/d2poll.html
> 
> --bb

i'm using __traits based runtime reflection.
besides that i could use 1.0.