November 01, 2007
Hi

This is the monthly status for the unofficial d wish list: http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/

Right now the wish list looks like this:

143  Reflection API (#6)
137  Stack tracing (#26)
101  vectorization (#10)
76  Multiple return values (tuples (#28)
74  Multiple opCast per class (#24)
68  Short syntax for new (#18)
62  unit test after compilation (#1)
62  extra compiler values (#19)
62  Debug check for null reference (#52)
60  Native AMD64 codegen (#36)
57  !in (#44)
51  Explicit out/inout (#38)
48  Return-type overloading (#49)
47  Unit test isolation  (#2)
42  Posix threads support native (#3)
42  Array masking (#11)
42  Foreach on first/on last (#42)
39  better syntax for cast (#23)
35  Explicit type initializers (#35)
33  Consistent struct/class sizeof (#40)
33  Array pushback/popback (#51)
32  associative arrays by index (#16)
31  black box unit testing (#8)
29  Pass value params byref (#34)
29  Non-Static isExpression (#37)
28  unit test & code separation (#7)
27  coherent assoc. array syntax (#20)
27  Explicit module `friendship` (#43)
27  auto-member objects (#45)
27  L-Value return (#73)
25  Renaming ctor/dtor (#17)
23  Unit test measurements (#9)
22  Conditional syncronized (#30)
21  Explicit property keyword (#83)
21  struct constructor (#97)
20  User-defined sync function (#31)
19  proper cast operators (#21)
19  Named keyword arguments (#87)
19  Variadic arguments re-passing (#102)
17  Iterators and Generators (#58)
17  Small Exectables (#88)
16  Pascal like sets (#61)
15  Built-in variant type (#56)
15  if, while, true, false, int (#86)
14  D library contest (#59)
13  Precise names for floats (#62)
13  Inline enum declaration (#76)
13  No Postfix Array Declarations (#85)
11  Call log (#47)
11  imag and comp FP types. (#63)
11  modules must not rely on files (#84)
10  inout variable and return (#60)
10  conv() and opConv (#66)
10  Meta Information (#69)
10  interface to C++ (#71)
10  range type (#106)
10  Full lexical closures (#140)
9  Against class instance sizeof (#48)
9  Improve module architecture (#64)
9  copy operator (#95)
8  Finite sets (#72)
8  opCast overloading (#81)
8  function inheritance (#92)
8  Multi-Dimensional Allocation (#109)
7  Relational class/array algebra (#65)
7  inline expansion (#67)
7  In flight exception detection (#101)
6  garbage collection switch  (#96)
6  Real C bitfields (#145)
5  date/time/datetime literal (#105)
4  Declaration in function calls (#74)
4  support struct&array in switch (#99)
4  named tuple (#103)
4  void Class.Method() {} syntax (#146)
3  array in template arguments (#91)
3  System.Windows.Forms (#93)
3  Statically check for == null (#98)
3  Reallocation Keyword (#108)
3  First-class continuations (#141)
2  Manage .resources files (#70)
2  Multistep return (#75)
2  constant operater overloading (#100)
2  Explicit out/inout/lazy (#110)
2  Quick For Syntax (#142)
2  Implicit New (#143)
2  static foreach(scope/unscope) (#152)
1  consistant new (#77)
1  Parallel Scavenging GC (#80)
1  solve interdepend static this (#107)
1  function call over network (#111)
1  temp alias param specialize (#112)
1  Better UTF32 Support (#113)
1  Property shortcut (#144)
1  remove initializers (#147)
1  Efficient array opCatAssign (#148)
1  variable template(short syntax (#149)
1  template literal (#150)
1  tuple literal and append-op (#151)
1  __traits (#153)
1  ext property for  basic types (#154)
1  temporary variable (#155)
1  invariant function (#156)
1  constant member functions (#158)
1  in for arrays (#160)
1  in for arrays (#161)
0  Dynamic Conditional (#157)
0  Custom Attributes (#159)
0  Keyword Pow Operator (#162)
November 01, 2007
<4tuu4k002@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:fgb89g$49a$1@digitalmars.com...
> Hi
>
> This is the monthly status for the unofficial d wish list:
> http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/

It would help if you put the date in the subject line of these posts.  The way it is, newsreaders tend to run all the status updates into one thread that just grows and grows.

BTW I just noticed:
"The description is to context-free to vote on."

Was I imagining it, or did it originally say "content-free", which is what I said?

Stewart.

-- 
My e-mail address is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on the 'group where everybody may benefit.