On Friday, 9 June 2017 at 22:01:14 UTC, Michael Reiland wrote:
> So if I'm understanding this code correctly, your libs don't have any sort of routing setup either, and I would have to write the code to inspect the URL and do the right thing?

web.d does (it is automatic via names in the source code and nesting of types or aliases), but I don't support that for third parties.

It isn't really difficult to do though, `cgi.pathInfo` is all the stuff at the end and you can pretty easily do whatever with it.

(to be honest I have never understood why routing is such a major hassle in other libs. It has always been either a just-works or a trivial matter to me.)

> I think I'd prefer to use more of a template system as it feels more productive having it all inline.

huh, I hate template systems. They just so quickly become complete messes with tons of boring code duplication and idiotic syntaxes that are harder to use than plain html+helpers.