December 25, 2008 dmd platform support - poll | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using? .net jvm mac osx 32 bit intel mac osx 64 bit intel linux 64 bit windows 64 bit freebsd 32 bit netbsd 32 bit other? |
December 25, 2008 Re: dmd platform support - poll | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Walter Bright <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote:
> What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
mac osx 32 bit intel
If I can only vote for one that would be my pick.
--bb
|
December 25, 2008 Re: dmd platform support - poll | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Walter Bright wrote:
> What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
>
> .net
> jvm
> mac osx 32 bit intel
> mac osx 64 bit intel
> linux 64 bit
> windows 64 bit
> freebsd 32 bit
> netbsd 32 bit
>
> other?
64bit - both windows and linux.
personally I don't see a point in JVM/.NET - One of the best things about D is that you get the ease of use of Ruby/python/etc with the benefits of native compiling like in c/c++. Why throw that away and make yet another version of Java/C# ?
|
December 25, 2008 Re: dmd platform support - poll | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Walter Bright Wrote:
> What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
>
> .net
> jvm
> mac osx 32 bit intel
> mac osx 64 bit intel
> linux 64 bit
> windows 64 bit
> freebsd 32 bit
> netbsd 32 bit
Linux 64 bit
Mac osx 32 bit intel
|
December 25, 2008 Re: dmd platform support - poll | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 23:30:52 +0300, Walter Bright <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote:
> What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
>
> .net
> jvm
> mac osx 32 bit intel
> mac osx 64 bit intel
> linux 64 bit
> windows 64 bit
> freebsd 32 bit
> netbsd 32 bit
>
> other?
Linux 64 bit
Windows 32 bit :)
|
December 25, 2008 Re: dmd platform support - poll | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 12:30:52PM -0800, Walter Bright wrote: > What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using? The ones I wouldn't mind seeing in order of descending preference: windows 64 bit linux 64 bit freebsd 32 bit .net jvm However, if implementing any of this takes resources away from continuing work on the existing platforms, I'd say don't worry about it; Windows and Linux 32 bit are certainly good enough for me. -- Adam D. Ruppe http://arsdnet.net |
December 25, 2008 Re: dmd platform support - poll | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Reply to Walter, > What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using? > > .net kind'a sort'a > jvm no > mac osx 32 bit intel yes > mac osx 64 bit intel yes > linux 64 bit yes (YES if cross compile avalable) > windows 64 bit ditto linux 64 bit > freebsd 32 bit no > netbsd 32 bit no > other? > |
December 25, 2008 Re: dmd platform support - poll | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Walter Bright wrote:
> What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
In order of preference:
mac osx 32 bit intel
linux 64 bit
mac osx 64 bit intel
|
December 26, 2008 Re: dmd platform support - poll | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Windows 64 bit
Mac OSX 64 bit - intel
Maemo - ARM (Texas Instruments OMAP)
--
serg.
|
December 26, 2008 Re: dmd platform support - poll | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | I'm perfectly happy with 32 windows & linux, but have some minor interest in: Solaris x86 JVM Windows 64-bit .net |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation