On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 16:26:31 UTC, QAston wrote:
> Looks like you've destroyed C++ concepts with this talk.

It's kind of unfortunate for C++ because D has the benefit of hindsight. Ranges instead of iterators, DbI instead of Concepts/Generic Programming, static if/version/templates instead of the preprocessor, modules instead of textual #include... the list goes on.

Great! :-)

You know, I think I'm slightly disappointed they cut the moment when the USB presentation controller cut out early in my talk.  I kind of thought that was fun. :-P

On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 10:54:16 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
>
> Bummer, they didn't use the screen cap video I sent, so there's no code shown or anything for quite long sections, which makes it quite hard to follow :(
>
> Who would be the best person to contact about this?

I was just going to say this, but it looks like you beat me to it. Still pretty excellent talk though, even if I missed some of what you were talking about at the end.

On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 10:30:00 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
> All released talks are on this playlist:
> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL12FA104E02ABE730

I have also create playlist which includes only dconf 2015 videos for easier sharing : https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEDeq48KhndP-mlE-0Bfb_qPIMA4RrrKo

On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 10:54:16 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 10:30:00 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
>> [...]
>
> Bummer, they didn't use the screen cap video I sent, so there's no code shown or anything for quite long sections, which makes it quite hard to follow :(
>
> Who would be the best person to contact about this?

Yeah, the whole last 10 or so mins of Adams talk is almost impossible to follow.
Which is a pity, as it's very interesting up to that point!

On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 14:20:17 UTC, wobbles wrote:
> Yeah, the whole last 10 or so mins of Adams talk is almost impossible to follow.

I haven't watched it at all yet, what part? I can probably just fill you in in writing.

(Eventually, when I have a few hours to waste, I'll type up a transcript too.)

> Which is a pity, as it's very interesting up to that point!

lol :)

On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 14:27:55 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 14:20:17 UTC, wobbles wrote:
>> Yeah, the whole last 10 or so mins of Adams talk is almost impossible to follow.
>
> I haven't watched it at all yet, what part? I can probably just fill you in in writing.
>
> (Eventually, when I have a few hours to waste, I'll type up a transcript too.)
>
>> Which is a pity, as it's very interesting up to that point!
>
> lol :)

After the last slide in your presentation, you begin to give a demo of the code. From then on, nothing on screen is shown :/

On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 14:54:50 UTC, wobbles wrote:
>
> After the last slide in your presentation, you begin to give a demo of the code. From then on, nothing on screen is shown :/

The stuff about OpenCL

On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 22:02:47 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 14:54:50 UTC, wobbles wrote:
>>
>> After the last slide in your presentation, you begin to give a demo of the code. From then on, nothing on screen is shown :/
>
> The stuff about OpenCL

Wha?! I thought it was John Colvin that talked about OpenCL? Was Adam talking about it as well?!

Cheers,

A.

On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 22:17:50 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 22:02:47 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
>> On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 14:54:50 UTC, wobbles wrote:
>>>
>>> After the last slide in your presentation, you begin to give a demo of the code. From then on, nothing on screen is shown :/
>>
>> The stuff about OpenCL
>
> Wha?! I thought it was John Colvin that talked about OpenCL? Was Adam talking about it as well?!
>
> Cheers,
>
> A.

Yeah I seem to remember since Adam said his last talk was so low level he wanted to go high level this time, just to keep it real....

A.