On 2012-01-02 00:28, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Sunday, January 01, 2012 15:31:18 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> What's wrong with being able to run the unit tests from your editor,
>> have the unit test framework output HTML (or similar), displayed in your
>> editor and then you can click on links in the stack trace to get to the
>> source code. If you don't see why that's useful that we can just end
>> this discussion now.
>
> If you want fancier unit test facilities in your own code. Fine. I just don't
> think that they should be in the standard library. I think that on the whole,
> D's built-in unit test framework works fine as it is (barring a few tweaks such
> as making it so that all unittest blocks within a module run), and that
> further additions are a needless complication to the standard unit testing
> facilities and better left to 3rd party solutions where you can do whatever
> you want with them.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

I'm ending the discussion here.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg