Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 18, 2012 Whiley mentions D | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Interesting read: http://whiley.org/2012/01/18/connecting-the-dots-on-the-future-of-programming-languages/ Quote: "This leads me to the final and, I think, most important question: Which mainstream programming languages currently support pure functions and/or other mechanisms for aggressively limiting side-effects? Haskell is clearly one example, D is another. But, what else?" |
January 18, 2012 Re: Whiley mentions D | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Stephan | Stephan Wrote:
> Interesting read:
>
> http://whiley.org/2012/01/18/connecting-the-dots-on-the-future-of-programming-languages/
The answer about Clojure seems written by someone living under a reality distortion field. Surely Haskell, D and Clojure are not "mainstream". The only "mainstream" thing of D is its C-like syntax.
The relative Reddit thread shows that there is a significant ignorance still about purity and immutability of D.
Bye,
bearophile
|
January 18, 2012 Re: Whiley mentions D | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile | I would consider Haskell and Clojure already "almost mainstream", as there are quite a few companies listing jobs with them. Some of them quite important, like Intel, Microsoft, LinkedIn, Galois, JaneStreet among others. "bearophile" wrote in message news:jf6e5n$18td$1@digitalmars.com... Stephan Wrote: > Interesting read: > > http://whiley.org/2012/01/18/connecting-the-dots-on-the-future-of-programming-languages/ The answer about Clojure seems written by someone living under a reality distortion field. Surely Haskell, D and Clojure are not "mainstream". The only "mainstream" thing of D is its C-like syntax. The relative Reddit thread shows that there is a significant ignorance still about purity and immutability of D. Bye, bearophile |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation