April 03, 2012 Nested functions should be exempt from sequential visibility rules | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Regarding this: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=790 I submit that nested functions should be exempt from the usual sequential visibility rules. (Therefore, mutually recursive nested functions would become possible.) Or at the very *least*, this horrific C-like workaround should be possible: void foo() { void b(); void a() {...}; void b() {...}; } ...Flame away! ;) |
April 03, 2012 Re: Nested functions should be exempt from sequential visibility rules | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Nick Sabalausky | Sorry, I didn't mean this to go into "D.announce". Reposting in the proper place... Can this one be deleted? |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation