Thread overview | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 12, 2012 DMD 2.059 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
The changelog mentions DMD 2.059 as released on April 1, 2012, but there is no link to it. Is it released? http://dlang.org/changelog.html |
April 12, 2012 Re: DMD 2.059 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Alvaro | On 12-04-2012 20:49, Alvaro wrote: > The changelog mentions DMD 2.059 as released on April 1, 2012, but there > is no link to it. Is it released? > > http://dlang.org/changelog.html It's not released yet. This is why listing the next release on that page is a bad idea... -- - Alex |
April 12, 2012 Re: DMD 2.059 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Alex Rønne Petersen | El 12/04/2012 20:50, Alex Rønne Petersen escribió:
> On 12-04-2012 20:49, Alvaro wrote:
>> The changelog mentions DMD 2.059 as released on April 1, 2012, but there
>> is no link to it. Is it released?
>>
>> http://dlang.org/changelog.html
>
> It's not released yet.
>
> This is why listing the next release on that page is a bad idea...
>
OK. Maybe if the page said "Unreleased" or "Expected release date xxx"...
|
April 12, 2012 Re: DMD 2.059 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Alvaro | On 04/12/2012 11:49 AM, Alvaro wrote:
> The changelog mentions DMD 2.059 as released on April 1, 2012, but there
> is no link to it. Is it released?
>
> http://dlang.org/changelog.html
I don't think it was intended but don't trust anything that is dated April 1. :p
Ali
|
April 12, 2012 Re: DMD 2.059 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ali Çehreli | On 04/12/2012 02:58 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 11:49 AM, Alvaro wrote:
>> The changelog mentions DMD 2.059 as released on April 1, 2012, but there
>> is no link to it. Is it released?
>>
>> http://dlang.org/changelog.html
>
> I don't think it was intended but don't trust anything that is dated
> April 1. :p
>
> Ali
I noticed that as well last night, got excited, and then was quickly confused. :/ Especially since it's clickable.
-Matt
|
April 12, 2012 Re: DMD 2.059 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Alex Rønne Petersen | On Thursday, April 12, 2012 20:50:16 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 12-04-2012 20:49, Alvaro wrote:
> > The changelog mentions DMD 2.059 as released on April 1, 2012, but there is no link to it. Is it released?
> >
> > http://dlang.org/changelog.html
>
> It's not released yet.
>
> This is why listing the next release on that page is a bad idea...
I think that it's a side effect of how the beta is dealt with, but I don't know (2.059 is in beta right now - head to the beta list if you want to discuss it). Certainly, I'd argue that it shouldn't be listed until it's actually released and that if it's been done on purpose, it's that much worse.
- Jonathan M Davis
|
April 21, 2012 Re: DMD 2.059 ?? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Matt Soucy | On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:08:54 -0400, Matt Soucy wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 02:58 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> On 04/12/2012 11:49 AM, Alvaro wrote:
>>> The changelog mentions DMD 2.059 as released on April 1, 2012, but there is no link to it. Is it released?
>>>
>>> http://dlang.org/changelog.html
>>
>> I don't think it was intended but don't trust anything that is dated April 1. :p
>>
>> Ali
> I noticed that as well last night, got excited, and then was quickly
> confused. :/ Especially since it's clickable.
> -Matt
All it needs is a paragraph to state the truth.
next release is still in progress, can be checked out from github
linkhere, built, tested,
these are the features and fixes thought already done,
list of other stable point goal feature/fixes of next release, hopeful
date when done. Usual warning of unstable bits.
Or point a link to github page stating similar.
Surely thats not too difficult?
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation