I've met Matt Goldbolt, the author of the GCC Explorer at http://gcc.godbolt.org - a very handy online disassembler for GCC.

We got to talk a bit about D and he hacked together support for D by using gdc. Take a look at http://d.godbolt.org, I think it's pretty darn cool! I'm talking to him about integrating his work with our servers.


Andrei

On 21 September 2012 04:47, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail@erdani.org> wrote:
> I've met Matt Goldbolt, the author of the GCC Explorer at http://gcc.godbolt.org - a very handy online disassembler for GCC.
>
> We got to talk a bit about D and he hacked together support for D by using gdc. Take a look at http://d.godbolt.org, I think it's pretty darn cool! I'm talking to him about integrating his work with our servers.
>
>
> Andrei

That's awesome. :-)


-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';

On 9/21/12, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail@erdani.org> wrote:
> snip

Integrating this with dpaste would be aweee..sooome!

On 2012-09-21 05:47, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I've met Matt Goldbolt, the author of the GCC Explorer at
> http://gcc.godbolt.org - a very handy online disassembler for GCC.
>
> We got to talk a bit about D and he hacked together support for D by
> using gdc. Take a look at http://d.godbolt.org, I think it's pretty darn
> cool! I'm talking to him about integrating his work with our servers.

That's pretty cool.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I've met Matt Goldbolt, the author of the GCC Explorer at http://gcc.godbolt.org - a very handy online disassembler for GCC.

This is not a disassembler. It just stops compilation before the
assembler (gcc -S). A dissembler would create the assembler code given
only the machine code.
But it's nice to have source code and assembly side by side.

Jens

On Friday, 21 September 2012 at 10:04:00 UTC, Jens Mueller wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> I've met Matt Goldbolt, the author of the GCC Explorer at
>> http://gcc.godbolt.org - a very handy online disassembler for GCC.
>
> This is not a disassembler. It just stops compilation before the
> assembler (gcc -S). A dissembler would create the assembler code given
> only the machine code.

You are both correct and incredibly pedantic. :P

On 21 September 2012 11:17, Bernard Helyer <b.helyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, 21 September 2012 at 10:04:00 UTC, Jens Mueller wrote:
>>
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>
>>> I've met Matt Goldbolt, the author of the GCC Explorer at http://gcc.godbolt.org - a very handy online disassembler for GCC.
>>
>>
>> This is not a disassembler. It just stops compilation before the assembler (gcc -S). A dissembler would create the assembler code given only the machine code.
>
>
> You are both correct and incredibly pedantic. :P

Half correct and incredibly pedantic. :-)

There's two modes.  One is assembler output, the other is objdump
output (which is a disassembler).

-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';

On 21 September 2012 11:29, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On 21 September 2012 11:17, Bernard Helyer <b.helyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Friday, 21 September 2012 at 10:04:00 UTC, Jens Mueller wrote:
>>>
>>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've met Matt Goldbolt, the author of the GCC Explorer at http://gcc.godbolt.org - a very handy online disassembler for GCC.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is not a disassembler. It just stops compilation before the assembler (gcc -S). A dissembler would create the assembler code given only the machine code.
>>
>>
>> You are both correct and incredibly pedantic. :P
>
> Half correct and incredibly pedantic. :-)
>
> There's two modes.  One is assembler output, the other is objdump
> output (which is a disassembler).
>

And if it doesn't then I must be incredibly confused at this hour in
the morning (yawns).


-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';

Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 21 September 2012 11:29, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > On 21 September 2012 11:17, Bernard Helyer <b.helyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Friday, 21 September 2012 at 10:04:00 UTC, Jens Mueller wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I've met Matt Goldbolt, the author of the GCC Explorer at http://gcc.godbolt.org - a very handy online disassembler for GCC.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> This is not a disassembler. It just stops compilation before the assembler (gcc -S). A dissembler would create the assembler code given only the machine code.
> >>
> >>
> >> You are both correct and incredibly pedantic. :P
> >
> > Half correct and incredibly pedantic. :-)
> >
> > There's two modes.  One is assembler output, the other is objdump
> > output (which is a disassembler).
> >
> 
> And if it doesn't then I must be incredibly confused at this hour in
> the morning (yawns).

How do I use the objdump mode in the web interface?

Jens

Andrei Alexandrescu:

> I've met Matt Goldbolt, the author of the GCC Explorer at http://gcc.godbolt.org - a very handy online disassembler for GCC.
>
> We got to talk a bit about D and he hacked together support for D by using gdc. Take a look at http://d.godbolt.org, I think it's pretty darn cool! I'm talking to him about integrating his work with our servers.

It's a nice idea. I'd like a way to filter the output to the
disassembly of just one (or few) functions, because otherwise the
output risks being too much large.

At my second try I have received this, I don't know why:

<No output: Error: Command failed: cat:
/tmp/gcc-explorer-compiler11285-17644-1vcygvl/output.S: No such
file or directory
core.exception.AssertError@/usr/include/d2/4.6/std/stdio.d(989):
Bug in File.readln
>

Bye,
bearophile