On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 at 07:04:39 UTC, eles wrote:
> I think the correct counter-attack is simply to write a note showing those cases that concepts lite do not solve, at least not as nicely as static if would have.

It is probably not a good idea to bring more attention to it… some might end up agreeing with Stroustrup.

"static if" is a troubled construct and too close to macros to be a good language design feature, it is in the same bag as string mixins. "if(constexpr…)" + concepts etc better fit C++.

> Eventually with D examples. It will bring audience.

Yes, this a  better idea. Write code examples that compare common C++ patterns to D where D looks cleaner.