Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
March 21, 2013 [Issue 9770] New: Remove opCmp from Object | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9770 Summary: Remove opCmp from Object Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: druntime AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: jmdavisProg@gmx.com --- Comment #0 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com> 2013-03-21 00:03:15 PDT --- Per this thread http://forum.dlang.org/post/jtlj1k$1fdj$1@digitalmars.com , it was decided to try and go the path of removing opEquals, opCmp, toHash, and toString from Object, as they don't need to be there, and the fact that they're there is causing issues with attributes such as const ( issue# 1824 ). This issue is specifically for opCmp so that any work towards making it unnecessary and removing it can be referenced here, whereas the other 3 have separate bugzilla entries, as the work for them isn't necessarily related to each other. opEquals, opCmp, and toHash in particular may require substantial work to be done on the built-in AAs before they can actually be removed from Object, as the AA implementation is not currently templated like it should be. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
March 21, 2013 [Issue 9770] Remove opCmp from Object | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jonathan M Davis | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9770 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com> 2013-03-21 00:05:48 PDT --- Related: opEquals: issue# 9769 toHash: issue# 9771 toString: issue# 9772 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
October 13, 2013 [Issue 9770] Remove opCmp from Object | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jonathan M Davis | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9770 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com> 2013-10-13 16:17:23 PDT --- Relevant discussion on how to transition away from having these functions on Object (the thread got broken up a bit - probably by the mailman bug): http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.214.1369617617.13711.digitalmars-d@puremagic.com http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.280.1369712394.13711.digitalmars-d@puremagic.com The key suggestion is to change the compiler so that those 4 functions can be free functions in object_.d, similar to how the compiler already does special stuff for == rather than simply calling Object's opEquals. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation