is there? if so, where is it? Also, I see dmd is written in C++ but still uses C style to do stuff eg, printf() instead of cout. Is this why C++ libraries can increase a lot size (and performance?) of executable which current style don't?

"asman"  wrote in message news:maojdlxhbwuhxqrmvvjf@forum.dlang.org...

> is there? if so, where is it? Also, I see dmd is written in C++ but still uses C style to do stuff eg, printf() instead of cout. Is this why C++ libraries can increase a lot size (and performance?) of executable which current style don't?

There are no formal rules that I'm aware of (unless somebody added them to the wiki) but the (frontend) code is fairly consistent.

The C-ish style is mostly due to age and Walter's preferences.  This has turned out to be a huge advantage as it makes conversion to D much easier than C++-style code with heavy stl usage etc. 

V Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:32:45 +0000
asman via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> napsáno:

> is there? if so, where is it?

http://dlang.org/dstyle.html

V Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:32:45 +0000
asman via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> napsáno:

> is there? if so, where is it?

sorry I post coding styles for D not for dmd

"DanielKozákvia Digitalmars-d"  wrote in message news:mailman.99.1397656987.2763.digitalmars-d@puremagic.com...

> sorry I post coding styles for D not for dmd

They are similar. 

On Wednesday, 16 April 2014 at 13:57:33 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> "asman"  wrote in message news:maojdlxhbwuhxqrmvvjf@forum.dlang.org...
>
>> is there? if so, where is it? Also, I see dmd is written in C++ but still uses C style to do stuff eg, printf() instead of cout. Is this why C++ libraries can increase a lot size (and performance?) of executable which current style don't?
>
> There are no formal rules that I'm aware of (unless somebody added them to the wiki) but the (frontend) code is fairly consistent.
>
> The C-ish style is mostly due to age and Walter's preferences.  This has turned out to be a huge advantage as it makes conversion to D much easier than C++-style code with heavy stl usage etc.

Thanks very much. In this case I can assume there's no std::
stuff and it isn't allowed, correct?

On Saturday, 19 April 2014 at 01:50:17 UTC, asman wrote:
> On Wednesday, 16 April 2014 at 13:57:33 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>> "asman"  wrote in message news:maojdlxhbwuhxqrmvvjf@forum.dlang.org...
>>
>>> is there? if so, where is it? Also, I see dmd is written in C++ but still uses C style to do stuff eg, printf() instead of cout. Is this why C++ libraries can increase a lot size (and performance?) of executable which current style don't?
>>
>> There are no formal rules that I'm aware of (unless somebody added them to the wiki) but the (frontend) code is fairly consistent.
>>
>> The C-ish style is mostly due to age and Walter's preferences.
>>  This has turned out to be a huge advantage as it makes conversion to D much easier than C++-style code with heavy stl usage etc.
>
> Thanks very much. In this case I can assume there's no std::
> stuff and it isn't allowed, correct?

I understood there's no formal rules but I mean, Walter will not like use these stuff

"asman"  wrote in message news:ktcpixnpmessxamqelmh@forum.dlang.org...

> Thanks very much. In this case I can assume there's no std::
> stuff and it isn't allowed, correct?

Yes.  If you started using namespaces, stl, etc it would break DDMD so it's essentially banned now.