Hello all,

Binaries for beta 1 is available for download and testing. You can find them at: http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing

Test!!! Document bugs/regressions!!! Enjoy!!!

Thanks to those who have contributed to the maintenance/upkeep of the wiki page. As I am no a full-time student with an overly aggressive class schedule, I am finding less and less time to keep track of what is going on. I appreciate the assistance.

Andrew

On 8/27/2014 2:19 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Binaries for beta 1 is available for download and testing. You can find them at:
> http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing
>
> Test!!! Document bugs/regressions!!! Enjoy!!!
>
> Thanks to those who have contributed to the maintenance/upkeep of the wiki page.
> As I am no a full-time student with an overly aggressive class schedule, I am
> finding less and less time to keep track of what is going on. I appreciate the
> assistance.
>
> Andrew

There has been a lot of valid criticism about us releasing 2.066 with outstanding regressions.

https://issues.dlang.org/buglist.cgi?bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&list_id=88763&query_format=advanced

Fixes exist:

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3884
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3879

Let's get them reviewed/pulled and do a 2.066 point release.

On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 21:22:42 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 8/27/2014 2:19 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Binaries for beta 1 is available for download and testing. You can find them at:
>> http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing
>>
>> Test!!! Document bugs/regressions!!! Enjoy!!!
>>
>> Thanks to those who have contributed to the maintenance/upkeep of the wiki page.
>> As I am no a full-time student with an overly aggressive class schedule, I am
>> finding less and less time to keep track of what is going on. I appreciate the
>> assistance.
>>
>> Andrew
>
> There has been a lot of valid criticism about us releasing 2.066 with outstanding regressions.
>
> https://issues.dlang.org/buglist.cgi?bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&list_id=88763&query_format=advanced
>
> Fixes exist:
>
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3884
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3879
>
> Let's get them reviewed/pulled and do a 2.066 point release.

Very true but this does not conflict with 2.067 cycle (other than competing for attention of compiler developers)

On 8/27/2014 2:27 PM, Dicebot wrote:
>> Let's get them reviewed/pulled and do a 2.066 point release.
>
> Very true but this does not conflict with 2.067 cycle (other than competing for
> attention of compiler developers)

You're right, somehow I misread 2.067 as 2.066. My mistake.

Does this 2.67 release contain COFF32, and the new package fix?


On 28 August 2014 07:45, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:

> On 8/27/2014 2:27 PM, Dicebot wrote:
>
>> Let's get them reviewed/pulled and do a 2.066 point release.
>>>
>>
>> Very true but this does not conflict with 2.067 cycle (other than
>> competing for
>> attention of compiler developers)
>>
>
> You're right, somehow I misread 2.067 as 2.066. My mistake.
>

On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 02:10:48 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> Does this 2.67 release contain COFF32, and the new package fix?

Yes to COFF32, though it's still undocumented in the help at the moment:

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commits/2.067

No to the package fix as of now, though maybe it'll be merged later.