Jump to page: 1 2 3
Thread overview
Deimos library interfaces needed for these
Oct 25, 2014
Walter Bright
Oct 26, 2014
Sean Kelly
Oct 27, 2014
Matt Soucy
Oct 28, 2014
Jesse Phillips
Oct 27, 2014
Vladimir Panteleev
Oct 27, 2014
Dicebot
Oct 27, 2014
Jacob Carlborg
Oct 27, 2014
Brad Anderson
Oct 28, 2014
Jacob Carlborg
Oct 28, 2014
John Colvin
Oct 31, 2014
Dicebot
Oct 27, 2014
Walter Bright
Oct 28, 2014
Vladimir Panteleev
Oct 28, 2014
David Nadlinger
Oct 28, 2014
Walter Bright
Oct 28, 2014
Walter Bright
Oct 28, 2014
David Nadlinger
Oct 28, 2014
Walter Bright
Oct 28, 2014
Vladimir Panteleev
Oct 28, 2014
Martin Nowak
Oct 28, 2014
Walter Bright
Oct 29, 2014
Martin Nowak
Oct 29, 2014
Walter Bright
October 25, 2014
https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos

http://en.docsity.com/news/programming-2/free-libraries-for-everyday-work-in-popular-languages/

These appear to have C interfaces, so should be tractable for D without too much effort.
October 26, 2014
On Saturday, 25 October 2014 at 20:49:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos
>
> http://en.docsity.com/news/programming-2/free-libraries-for-everyday-work-in-popular-languages/
>
> These appear to have C interfaces, so should be tractable for D without too much effort.

I think everyone has their personal favorites.  I'd love to see
someone sort out a version of Protobuf for D.  There's one for C,
but the generated headers would still have to be translated,
which isn't ideal.
October 27, 2014
On 10/26/2014 12:21 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
> On Saturday, 25 October 2014 at 20:49:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos
>>
>> http://en.docsity.com/news/programming-2/free-libraries-for-everyday-work-in-popular-languages/
>>
>> These appear to have C interfaces, so should be tractable for D without too much effort.
> 
> I think everyone has their personal favorites.  I'd love to see someone sort out a version of Protobuf for D.  There's one for C, but the generated headers would still have to be translated, which isn't ideal.
There's an implementation of protobuf in dub already: http://code.dlang.org/packages/dproto I should probably do some more work on it...

</shamelessplug>

-- 
Matt Soucy
http://msoucy.me/



October 27, 2014
On Saturday, 25 October 2014 at 20:49:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos
>
> http://en.docsity.com/news/programming-2/free-libraries-for-everyday-work-in-popular-languages/
>
> These appear to have C interfaces, so should be tractable for D without too much effort.

Before we add a bunch of more Deimos projects, can something be
done about the turnaround for Deimos pull requests? Right now, it
looks like the only way to get a pull merged is to ping you
personally to merge it.
October 27, 2014
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 07:48:16 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
> On Saturday, 25 October 2014 at 20:49:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos
>>
>> http://en.docsity.com/news/programming-2/free-libraries-for-everyday-work-in-popular-languages/
>>
>> These appear to have C interfaces, so should be tractable for D without too much effort.
>
> Before we add a bunch of more Deimos projects, can something be
> done about the turnaround for Deimos pull requests? Right now, it
> looks like the only way to get a pull merged is to ping you
> personally to merge it.

I personally consider Deimos legacy with addition of dub and
would actively discourage anyone from using it or relying on it.
October 27, 2014
On 10/27/2014 12:48 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> Before we add a bunch of more Deimos projects, can something be
> done about the turnaround for Deimos pull requests? Right now, it
> looks like the only way to get a pull merged is to ping you
> personally to merge it.

There are 13 members of Team Deimos who can pull:

https://github.com/orgs/D-Programming-Deimos/teams/team-deimos

October 27, 2014
On 2014-10-27 18:18, Dicebot wrote:

> I personally consider Deimos legacy with addition of dub and
> would actively discourage anyone from using it or relying on it.

I agree. I see no point in using it.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg
October 27, 2014
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 20:56:04 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2014-10-27 18:18, Dicebot wrote:
>
>> I personally consider Deimos legacy with addition of dub and
>> would actively discourage anyone from using it or relying on it.
>
> I agree. I see no point in using it.

+1

A Deimos category for dub already exists and is in use.

http://code.dlang.org/?sort=updated&category=library.binding.deimos

There's really no reason to have a centralized repository now that dub is around. It just adds a development bottleneck.

I'd prefer if the name Deimos were dropped as it's less intuitive than calling them by what they are: C bindings.
October 28, 2014
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 18:37:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 10/27/2014 12:48 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>> Before we add a bunch of more Deimos projects, can something be
>> done about the turnaround for Deimos pull requests? Right now, it
>> looks like the only way to get a pull merged is to ping you
>> personally to merge it.
>
> There are 13 members of Team Deimos who can pull:
>
> https://github.com/orgs/D-Programming-Deimos/teams/team-deimos

I'm not sure what happened here (and with the other OpenSSL pull requests), then:

https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos/openssl/pull/21
October 28, 2014
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 01:52:09 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> I'm not sure what happened here (and with the other OpenSSL pull requests), then:
>
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos/openssl/pull/21

The OpenSSL repo is not assigned to the Deimos team (and I wasn't previously part of it).

David
« First   ‹ Prev
1 2 3