September 18, 2014 Re: Increasing D's visibility | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Vladimir Panteleev | On Thursday, 18 September 2014 at 00:59:41 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
-snip-
> Off-topic question: I've been wondering, how do you magically appear here every time the Shootout is mentioned?
Google magic.
The project was renamed 6 years ago, it's the benchmarks game.
Google shootout and you'll find porn and gun fights.
|
September 18, 2014 Re: Increasing D's visibility | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Isaac Gouy | On Thursday, 18 September 2014 at 02:54:33 UTC, Isaac Gouy wrote:
> On Thursday, 18 September 2014 at 00:59:41 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> -snip-
>> Off-topic question: I've been wondering, how do you magically appear here every time the Shootout is mentioned?
>
> Google magic.
>
> The project was renamed 6 years ago, it's the benchmarks game.
>
> Google shootout and you'll find porn and gun fights.
Rule 34
|
October 30, 2014 Re: Increasing D's visibility | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Peter Alexander | On Wednesday, 17 September 2014 at 15:41:02 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 September 2014 at 14:59:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Awesome. Suggestion in order to leverage crowdsourcing: first focus on setting up the test bed such that adding benchmarks is easy. Then you and others can add a bunch of benchmarks.
>
> Yep, sounds like a plan.
Anything up already? A Github repo or something?
|
October 30, 2014 Re: Increasing D's visibility | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to deadalnix | On Thursday, 18 September 2014 at 03:25:19 UTC, deadalnix wrote: > On Thursday, 18 September 2014 at 02:54:33 UTC, Isaac Gouy wrote: >> On Thursday, 18 September 2014 at 00:59:41 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: > Rule 34 "Rule #34 There is porn of it. No exceptions." They refer to checked or unchecked exceptions? |
October 30, 2014 Re: Increasing D's visibility | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to eles | On Thursday, 30 October 2014 at 10:24:56 UTC, eles wrote:
> On Thursday, 18 September 2014 at 03:25:19 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Thursday, 18 September 2014 at 02:54:33 UTC, Isaac Gouy wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 18 September 2014 at 00:59:41 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>
>> Rule 34
>
> "Rule #34 There is porn of it. No exceptions."
>
> They refer to checked or unchecked exceptions?
One *may* find checked exceptions exciting if one is a masochist.
|
October 30, 2014 Re: Increasing D's visibility | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Meta | 1.) ADD Windows import of the C headers. 2.) ADD libraries such as Database and Gui 3.) Get a Scanner/Parser Generator going such as Antlr or Coco/r For now I had to deinstall 'D' again and i guess a lot of other people will do the same. |
October 30, 2014 Re: Increasing D's visibility | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to First Try | On Thursday, 30 October 2014 at 13:04:26 UTC, First Try wrote:
> 1.) ADD Windows import of the C headers.
> 2.) ADD libraries such as Database and Gui
> 3.) Get a Scanner/Parser Generator going such as Antlr or Coco/r
>
> For now I had to deinstall 'D' again and i guess a lot of other
> people will do the same.
These are all already available.
|
October 30, 2014 Re: Increasing D's visibility | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Gary Willoughby | On Thursday, 30 October 2014 at 16:48:23 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 October 2014 at 13:04:26 UTC, First Try wrote:
>> 1.) ADD Windows import of the C headers.
>> 2.) ADD libraries such as Database and Gui
>> 3.) Get a Scanner/Parser Generator going such as Antlr or Coco/r
>>
>> For now I had to deinstall 'D' again and i guess a lot of other
>> people will do the same.
>
> These are all already available.
If it wouldn't be impolite, i'd say that you are full of shit.
You are betraying people into believing that crap and because of people like you, they will waste a lot of time.
All to be found is half-baked stuff - most of it abandoned and as for the windows header files of D, they are utterly incomplete and not usable for 64 bit (Dsource).
You ought to be ashamed of yourself.
|
October 30, 2014 Re: Increasing D's visibility | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to First Try | On Thursday, 30 October 2014 at 17:11:40 UTC, First Try wrote: > On Thursday, 30 October 2014 at 16:48:23 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote: >> On Thursday, 30 October 2014 at 13:04:26 UTC, First Try wrote: > You ought to be ashamed of yourself. Hey, What about describing a bit more in detail the problems that you did encounter and see what can be done about it? Maybe we'll succeed in providing a wiki guide, too. |
October 30, 2014 Re: Increasing D's visibility | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to First Try Attachments: | On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:11:39 +0000
First Try via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> If it wouldn't be impolite, i'd say that you are full of shit.
> You are betraying people into believing that crap and because of
> people like you, they will waste a lot of time.
> All to be found is half-baked stuff - most of it abandoned and as
> for the windows header files of D, they are utterly incomplete
> and not usable for 64 bit (Dsource).
>
> You ought to be ashamed of yourself.
another drama queen...
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation