Thread overview
Dmitry Olshansky Passes GSoC Final Evaluation
Aug 24, 2012
Simen Kjaeraas
Aug 24, 2012
Dmitry Olshansky
Aug 25, 2012
Kagamin
August 24, 2012
Hi everybody,


I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation. Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos. This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself, but it's not like Dmitry will run away with the money :o).

Please join me in congratulating Dmitry. And Dmitry, let's get going with the integration.


Thanks,

Andrei
August 24, 2012
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:50:37 +0200, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail@erdani.org> wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
>
> I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation. Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos. This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself, but it's not like Dmitry will run away with the money :o).
>
> Please join me in congratulating Dmitry. And Dmitry, let's get going with the integration.


Congratulations!

-- 
Simen
August 24, 2012
On 24-Aug-12 19:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
>
> I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation.
> Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos.
> This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself,
> but it's not like Dmitry will run away with the money :o).

Thanks for your faith in me :o)

> Please join me in congratulating Dmitry. And Dmitry, let's get going
> with the integration.

It would be great if we can get help from compiler hackers, as I've collected some gems on my first attempt to merge it that may very well stall the process:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8412
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8348

And this one makes all isXXX impure atm:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8446

-- 
Olshansky Dmitry
August 24, 2012
On 8/24/12 2:44 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> On 24-Aug-12 19:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>>
>> I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation.
>> Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos.
>> This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself,
>> but it's not like Dmitry will run away with the money :o).
>
> Thanks for your faith in me :o)
>
>> Please join me in congratulating Dmitry. And Dmitry, let's get going
>> with the integration.
>
> It would be great if we can get help from compiler hackers, as I've
> collected some gems on my first attempt to merge it that may very well
> stall the process:
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8412
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8348
>
> And this one makes all isXXX impure atm:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8446

I elevated all these bugs to blocker status. BTW I wonder which is higher - P1 or P5?

Andrei


August 24, 2012
On 24-08-2012 20:49, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 8/24/12 2:44 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
>> On 24-Aug-12 19:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation.
>>> Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos.
>>> This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself,
>>> but it's not like Dmitry will run away with the money :o).
>>
>> Thanks for your faith in me :o)
>>
>>> Please join me in congratulating Dmitry. And Dmitry, let's get going
>>> with the integration.
>>
>> It would be great if we can get help from compiler hackers, as I've
>> collected some gems on my first attempt to merge it that may very well
>> stall the process:
>>
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8412
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8348
>>
>> And this one makes all isXXX impure atm:
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8446
>
> I elevated all these bugs to blocker status. BTW I wonder which is
> higher - P1 or P5?
>
> Andrei
>
>

They mean priority, so P1 would be highest.

-- 
Alex Rønne Petersen
alex@lycus.org
http://lycus.org
August 25, 2012
docs: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/page.cgi?id=fields.html#importance