https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10619

--- Comment #1 from hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx ---
Looks like the problem is that the mangling of both instances of 'dg' is identical, so the compiler thinks that they are the same function.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10619

--- Comment #2 from hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx ---
A slightly simpler test case:
-----
import std.stdio;

void myFunc(alias Sym)()
{
        writefln("%s", Sym);
}

void main()
{
        {
                {
                        int x = 789;
                        myFunc!x();
                }

                int x = 456;
                myFunc!x();
        }

        int x = 123;
        myFunc!x();
}
-----

Expected output:
-----
789
456
123
-----

Actual output:
-----
789
789
789
-----

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10619

--- Comment #3 from hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx ---
A clearly legal case that's currently broken:
----
import std.stdio;
void myFunc(alias Sym)()
{
        writeln(Sym);
}
void main()
{
        foreach (i; 0..3) {
                myFunc!i();
        }
        foreach (i; 5..8) {
                myFunc!i();
        }
}
----

Expected output:
----
0
1
2
5
6
7
----

Actual output:
----
0
1
2
2
2
2
----

The two instances of 'i' are clearly in distinct scopes, yet they are conflated in the mangling of myFunc, leading to wrong generated code.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10619

hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Out-of-scope variable in a  |Ambiguous mangling of local
                   |nested scope shadowed by    |variable alias arguments to
                   |subsequent variable in      |templates
                   |outer scope                 |

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10619

hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10619

Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |14831

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10619

Sönke Ludwig <sludwig@outerproduct.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sludwig@outerproduct.org

--- Comment #4 from Sönke Ludwig <sludwig@outerproduct.org> ---
I assume that this has the same root cause:

---
void checkAlias(X...)(int cmp) { assert(X[0] == cmp); }

void main() {
    foreach (j; 0 .. 2) {
        if (j == 0) {
            int i = 42;
            checkAlias!(i)(i); // succeeds (42 == 42)
        } else {
            int i = 13;
            checkAlias!(i)(i); // fails (42 == 13)
        }
    }
}
---

This is a reduced test case of https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/issues/863

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10619

--- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Sönke Ludwig from comment #4)
> I assume that this has the same root cause:
> 
> ---
> void checkAlias(X...)(int cmp) { assert(X[0] == cmp); }
> 
> void main() {
> 	foreach (j; 0 .. 2) {
> 		if (j == 0) {
> 			int i = 42;
> 			checkAlias!(i)(i); // succeeds (42 == 42)
> 		} else {
> 			int i = 13;
> 			checkAlias!(i)(i); // fails (42 == 13)
> 		}
> 	}
> }
> ---
> 
> This is a reduced test case of https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/issues/863

Yes, it's same issue.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10619

Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #6 from Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> ---


*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 14831 ***

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10619
Issue 10619 depends on issue 14831, which changed state.

Issue 14831 Summary: Each function local symbols should have unique mangled name https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14831

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WORKSFORME

--