Thread overview
[Issue 8177] Let the _type_ create the object; don't call _d_newclass directly!
Feb 20, 2020
Basile-z
Mar 21, 2020
Basile-z
September 10, 2014
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8177

hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx

--- Comment #2 from wfunction@hotmail.com ---
Oops, another correction, this time more minor:

There should be no 'typeid' for opDelete. It should simply say
typeof(instance).opDelete(instance).

(The goal here is to avoid virtual dispatch for opDelete() -- if the class designer deems them necessary, he/she can implement the virtual dispatching manually; for the compiler, only the compile-time type of the variable really matters.)

--
February 20, 2020
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8177

Basile-z <b2.temp@gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |b2.temp@gmx.com
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #3 from Basile-z <b2.temp@gmx.com> ---
considering that class allocators have been deprecated then removed this ER is not applicable.

--
March 21, 2020
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8177

Basile-z <b2.temp@gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|b2.temp@gmx.com             |

--