Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
September 10, 2014 [Issue 8177] Let the _type_ create the object; don't call _d_newclass directly! | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8177 hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx --- Comment #2 from wfunction@hotmail.com --- Oops, another correction, this time more minor: There should be no 'typeid' for opDelete. It should simply say typeof(instance).opDelete(instance). (The goal here is to avoid virtual dispatch for opDelete() -- if the class designer deems them necessary, he/she can implement the virtual dispatching manually; for the compiler, only the compile-time type of the variable really matters.) -- |
February 20, 2020 [Issue 8177] Let the _type_ create the object; don't call _d_newclass directly! | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8177 Basile-z <b2.temp@gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |b2.temp@gmx.com Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Basile-z <b2.temp@gmx.com> --- considering that class allocators have been deprecated then removed this ER is not applicable. -- |
March 21, 2020 [Issue 8177] Let the _type_ create the object; don't call _d_newclass directly! | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8177 Basile-z <b2.temp@gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|b2.temp@gmx.com | -- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation